2016
DOI: 10.1080/02587203.2016.1210920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Limpopo textbook litigation: a case study into the possibilities of a transformative constitutionalism

Abstract: In December 2015, the Supreme Court of Appeal ('SCA') in its judgment in the case of Minister of Basic Education v Basic Education for All held that every learner is entitled to a textbook in every subject at the commencement of the academic year. This article discusses and analyses the judgment. In particular, it examines the contribution of the judgment to the doctrine of transformative constitutionalism as evidenced by the SCA's approach to the interpretation of the rights to basic education and equality, r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While physical resources and infrastructure are by themselves insufficient to guarantee the right to education, they are unquestionably imperative for this given their direct effect on the quality and viability of education and the human dignity of learners. Provision of resources and infrastructure must, therefore, be prioritised if education is to achieve social justice and assist in poverty reduction (Veriava 2016). Given the prevailing situation as evidenced by the findings of this study, it is evident that the war to promote the right to education based on the principles of social justice is far from being won.…”
Section: Teaching and Learning Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…While physical resources and infrastructure are by themselves insufficient to guarantee the right to education, they are unquestionably imperative for this given their direct effect on the quality and viability of education and the human dignity of learners. Provision of resources and infrastructure must, therefore, be prioritised if education is to achieve social justice and assist in poverty reduction (Veriava 2016). Given the prevailing situation as evidenced by the findings of this study, it is evident that the war to promote the right to education based on the principles of social justice is far from being won.…”
Section: Teaching and Learning Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…118 Disadvantage can be ascribed to: 119 the extant history of apartheid's formalised inequality and subjugation in education, 120 as well as subsequent inadequate maintenance and construction of infrastructure, a lack of transport, non-delivery of learning material, human resource deficits, etc; and absent or abdicated management, oversight, and long-term planning from government at all levels. 121 Education is an empowering right with transformative potentialthe potential to lift individuals and entire communities out of abject poverty and into the economy. 122 However, education is only empowering when accessible.…”
Section: Case Law Examination: Provisioning For Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…109 In other words, the court has, somewhat less explicitly, suggested that teaching and non-teaching posts in schools are further entitlements in respect of the right to basic education. 110 From an assessment of the case law discussed above, Veriava notes that numerous principles have come to the fore, including that the right to basic education is a right that is immediately realisable as a first-generation right, and that it requires the State to take all measures necessary to ensure its full realisation. 111 Moreover, the courts have seemingly adopted a content-based approach to the interpretation of the right to basic education in order to elaborate on the components that make up the 'basket of entitlements' due to all beneficiaries of the right thereof.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%