1985
DOI: 10.1086/162796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The line profiles generated in the bow shocks of a Herbig-Haro object

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Double-peaked spectra have been found for a number of HH objects (e.g., HH 1, Choe, & Solf 1985 ;HH 32, Solf, & Bohm, Bohm, Raga 1986), which prompted the investigation of model HH bows (e.g., Choe et al 1985 ;Raga & 1985 ;Raga Bohm 1986 ;Raga & 1986Raga & , 1987, Bohm Bohm, Hartigan 1989) resulting in the following set of generalized conclusions. When the direction of motion for a bow shock is in the plane of the sky, the line proÐle is symmetric and triangular (e.g., see the h \ 90¡ panel in Fig.…”
Section: Ine Proðlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Double-peaked spectra have been found for a number of HH objects (e.g., HH 1, Choe, & Solf 1985 ;HH 32, Solf, & Bohm, Bohm, Raga 1986), which prompted the investigation of model HH bows (e.g., Choe et al 1985 ;Raga & 1985 ;Raga Bohm 1986 ;Raga & 1986Raga & , 1987, Bohm Bohm, Hartigan 1989) resulting in the following set of generalized conclusions. When the direction of motion for a bow shock is in the plane of the sky, the line proÐle is symmetric and triangular (e.g., see the h \ 90¡ panel in Fig.…”
Section: Ine Proðlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a number of objects either a part or all of the above listed observations have been explained successfully by bow shock models. This is especially true for HH 1, HH32, HH34, HH43, HH47 and (to a lesser extent) HH 2 (see e.g., Choe, Bohm and Solf 1985;Raga and Bohm 1986;Reipurth et al 1986;Solf, Bohm and Raga 1986;Raymond, Hartigan and Hartmann 1988;). If we restrict ourselves to the interpretation of (spatially integrated) line profiles and to line flux ratios, the bow shock models have been tested and shown to be applicable to many more HH objects .…”
Section: The Interpretation Of Hh Spectra In Terms Of Hydrodynamimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The position-velocity diagrams as well as spatially integrated line profiles have played an especially large role in the test of bow shock model of HH objects. (See e.g., Choe, Bohm and Solf 1985;Raga and Bohm 1985, 1986Solf, Bohm and Raga 1986. ) Spatially resolved high resolution spectroscopy (with 15-20 kms "' resolution) is available 12 of the brighter HH objects (HH 1, HH2, HH3, HH7, HH8, HH10, HH 11, HH 12, HH24, HH32, HH34, HH43, HH47).…”
Section: Spectroscopy and Its Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequently, Hartmann & Raymond (1984) proposed that a bow shock model could replicate the observations of HH1 and HH2; several papers demonstrated that bow shock model position/velocity diagrams fitted the observations (Choe, Böhm & Solf, 1985;Raga & Böhm, 1985;Raga, 1986); and the important paper by Hartigan, Raymond & Hartmann (1987) explored in detail the excitation and line profile predicted for bow shock observations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%