The Lineage Theory of the Regional Variation of Individualism/Collectivism in China

Abstract

China has undergone a rapid process of modernization since 1949. The modernization process has accelerated with the development of the market economy and rural-to-urban migration after the 1980s. Nevertheless, Chinese regions still exhibit substantial differences in terms of individualist/collectivist cultural orientations. The rice theory and the climato-economic theory have attempted to explain this variation by analyzing provincial-level data. Based on a quantitative analysis of more granular, county-level variables spanning from the early 1990s until 2010, we offer an alternative account of this cultural variety based on lineage development in different Chinese regions. Using the ArcGIS geographic information system, we first present the regional distribution of individualism/collectivism indicators at the county level through descriptive statistics and spatial analysis. We also run a regression model to analyze county-level data on individualism/collectivism that includes three periods (1990, 2000, and 2010). Our multi-level analysis shows that lineage development is a critical variable that explains more regional variation of culture in China when compared to other variables. While rice farming, the key variable of the rice theory, is a significant variable, its explanatory power is less than the lineage variable. Finally, our analysis shows that the climato-economic theory fails to explain the regional variation of culture.

The experiences of caring for disabled older adults in long-term: A qualitative study from the perspective of spousal caregivers

“…Influenced by Confucianism and collectivism, they sacrificed their interests to meet the demands of the entire family. 11 A study showed that older adults were less likely to receive spousal care when the quality of the relationship was low. 9 In our study, however, spousal caregivers still provided care in this situation.…”

“…10 When an individual's desires collide with the requirements of the family, the family comes first, mandating individual allegiance to the family. 11 Therefore, it is necessary to explore how spousal caregivers cope with this situation.…”

Interaction between Health and Financial Status on Coping Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Despite being under significant risk and pressure, our results showed that many Chinese participants were inclined to give up. Considering the collectivist structure of Chinese culture [ 63 , 64 ] with a public emphasis on the community’s wellbeing [ 65 ], our research results indicate that even in highly collectivist cultures, people are inclined to give up and dismiss the potential risks that their behaviors can pose to others. Theoretically, this poses an interesting research area for the future.…”

The macropsychology of COVID-19: Psychological governance as pandemic response.

“…For example, the Chinese population are generally deemed to have a cultural tradition of collectivism, whereby the Han culture places a higher importance on the interests and goals of the family and lineage above those of the individual (Gong et al, 2021). In the United States, several studies have indicated that American culture has become increasingly individualistic over time (see Ogihara, 2017).…”