2009
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2511080671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Linear No-Threshold Relationship Is Inconsistent with Radiation Biologic and Experimental Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
292
1
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 445 publications
(304 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
5
292
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Some contend that the model fails to account for the rate of radiation exposure or for cell capacity to repair radiation damage. 11 The assumed risk estimates are ultimately derived from analyses of mortality data based on Japanese atomic bomb survivors 7 exposed to intermediate radiation doses (approximately 40 mSv), like two or three typical CT scans in adults. The atomic bomb data provide strong evidence of an increased cancer mortality risk at equivalent doses Ͼ100 mSv, good evidence of an increased risk for doses between 50 and 100 mSv, and reasonable evidence for an increased risk for doses between 10 and 50 mSv.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some contend that the model fails to account for the rate of radiation exposure or for cell capacity to repair radiation damage. 11 The assumed risk estimates are ultimately derived from analyses of mortality data based on Japanese atomic bomb survivors 7 exposed to intermediate radiation doses (approximately 40 mSv), like two or three typical CT scans in adults. The atomic bomb data provide strong evidence of an increased cancer mortality risk at equivalent doses Ͼ100 mSv, good evidence of an increased risk for doses between 50 and 100 mSv, and reasonable evidence for an increased risk for doses between 10 and 50 mSv.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, medical personnel are more and more skeptical of LNT, since cells have repair mechanisms for damaged DNA. A study by Dr. Tubiana [81] and his team, published in the US National Institute of Health journal Radiology makes the case that below some specified level, increases in radiation have no adverse effects on humans. There is even a subculture, which believe that increases in low levels of radiation are beneficial to humans (Google Radiation hormesis), but this is obviously very speculative.…”
Section: Problems With Nuclear Energy: and Their Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eksperimentinių ir epidemiologinių tyrimų duomenys dėl 10-100 mSv JS dozių karcinogeninio poveikio nevienareikšmiai, tačiau yra studijų, patvirtinančių padidėjusią vėžio riziką gavus 10-100 mSv JS dozę [17][18][19][20][21]. Kaip jau buvo minėta, tokios JS dozės gaunamos atliekant pilvo ar krūtinės KT kelių fazių tyrimus, intervencinės radiologijos ir kai kurias branduolinės medicinos procedūras.…”
Section: Vėžio Rizikaunclassified