2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmp.2015.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The link between poverty, environment and ecotourism development in areas adjacent to Maasai Mara and Amboseli protected areas, Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Wildlife and livestock densities from the model are also correlated with conservation support. National parks and game reserves in Kenya cover 8% of the land surface and account for 35% of wildlife [14,98]. However, between 65% and 70% of wildlife is found in communal lands surrounding protected areas [14,99].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wildlife and livestock densities from the model are also correlated with conservation support. National parks and game reserves in Kenya cover 8% of the land surface and account for 35% of wildlife [14,98]. However, between 65% and 70% of wildlife is found in communal lands surrounding protected areas [14,99].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research suggests that economic growth, poverty alleviation, and ecological degradation may be linked (Zhang et al, 2015b), and that environmental degradation is one of the causes of poverty. Therefore, poverty and environmental degradation and their interactions should be addressed to pursue sustainable agricultural development (Wishitemi et al, 2015; Kanter et al, 2016; Poole et al, 2007), and sustainable agriculture (Baker and Griffis, 2009; Sivakumar et al, 2000; Cheng et al; Leakey et al, 2005). Consequences of non‐sustainable development are increasing environmental degradation and reduced ability to create wealth (Raleigh, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CBNRM channels social and economic benefits to communities in exchange for their participation in wildlife conservation. Benefits include secured access to land, institutional support, employment, and that profits from ecotourism can be more focused on supporting economically and socially fair and long-lasting partnerships with local communities39. We are optimistic that the Greater Mara ecosystem would benefit tremendously from such policies, hereunder focused on the human-animal conflicts directly caused by fencing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%