2007
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The link‐prediction problem for social networks

Abstract: Given a snapshot of a social network, can we infer which new interactions among its members are likely to occur in the near future? We formalize this question as the link-prediction problem, and we develop approaches to link prediction based on measures for analyzing the "proximity" of nodes in a network. Experiments on large co-authorship networks suggest that information about future interactions can be extracted from network topology alone, and that fairly subtle measures for detecting node proximity can ou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
1,773
2
17

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,079 publications
(1,803 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
11
1,773
2
17
Order By: Relevance
“…By writing software to automatically extract names from the papers, the pair built up a digital network several orders of magnitude larger than any that had been examined before, with each link representing two researchers who had collaborated. By following how the network changed over time, the researchers identified several measures of closeness among the researchers that could be used to forecast future collaborations 5 .…”
Section: Social Callsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By writing software to automatically extract names from the papers, the pair built up a digital network several orders of magnitude larger than any that had been examined before, with each link representing two researchers who had collaborated. By following how the network changed over time, the researchers identified several measures of closeness among the researchers that could be used to forecast future collaborations 5 .…”
Section: Social Callsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two indices based on classical random walks, Local Random Walk and Superpose Random Walk index, are considered. In addition, in [16] the Common Neighbours index, the Adamic-Adar index [17] and Resource Allocation index [18] had better performance in most cases. Here the three methods are also considered as the basic predictors.…”
Section: Baseline Predictorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They tested the predictive power of some proximity metrics, including Common neighbours, Adamic/Adar, Katz measure. They further worked on this problem in [5] with more descriptive analysis of same proximity metrics as in [4]. Here in both the works [4][5], their hypothesis was that link prediction could be performed from topological analysis alone.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Traditional weighted Common neighbor method [11] which is not considered to be better than unweighted Common neighbor [4][5], just takes simple addition of all of the weights of common nodes" links with nodes X and Y, no clear logic is shown for this addition so need to be modified.  Bigram approach [4][5] is not truly defined for link prediction in social networks. The actual bigram approach refers to find semantic relations between any two nodes X and Y (e.g.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation