2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-016-0957-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Lip-lip equality is stable under blow-up

Abstract: Abstract. We show that at generic points blow-ups/tangents of differentiability spaces are still differentiability spaces; this implies that an analytic condition introduced by Keith as an inequality (and later proved to actually be an equality) passes to tangents. As an application, we characterize the p-weak gradient on iterated blow-ups of differentiability spaces.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more recent application of this theory is the proof that at generic points blowups / tangents of differentiability spaces are still differentiability spaces, see [Sch15a]. Interestingly, that proof goes by contrapositive, and this theory comes to rescue as it works without the assumption of a differentiable structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more recent application of this theory is the proof that at generic points blowups / tangents of differentiability spaces are still differentiability spaces, see [Sch15a]. Interestingly, that proof goes by contrapositive, and this theory comes to rescue as it works without the assumption of a differentiable structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of (F6) the function F i can be glued together to get a (4/L + √ 2)-Lipschitz function f as in [Sch16b,Thm. 4.8].…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…if one has a (1, P )-Poincaré inequality but not a (1, P − ∆)-Poincaré, the minimal P -weak upper gradient and the minimal (P − ∆)-weak upper gradient can be different). One may check that this is not the case for our examples; this is unavoidable in the context of taking blow-ups as discussed in [Sch15a].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%