Linguistics and Literacy 1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-9302-7_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Literate Writes and the Nonliterate Chants: Written Language and Ritual Communication in Sociolinguistic Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study I have shown how young children explore the social practices associated with telephone discourse. These practices can be analysed according to the five domains set out in the introductory section (from Akinnaso, 1982) and used to challenge the divide between oral and written language.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study I have shown how young children explore the social practices associated with telephone discourse. These practices can be analysed according to the five domains set out in the introductory section (from Akinnaso, 1982) and used to challenge the divide between oral and written language.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are features that are clearly associated with print literacy, reflecting the language structure and degree of complexity (Akinnaso, 1982) of telephone discourse.…”
Section: Charlotte's Monologue -Perhaps To a Doctormentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using data from Yoruba, Akinnaso (1982) demonstrates that many of the structural and functional differences between spoken and written language, generally considered consequences of literacy and associated respectively with nonliterate and literate societies, also serve to distinguish between ordinary conversation and ritual language in nonliterate societies. Two major differences between spoken and written language are intrinsically involved in the acquisition of literacy.…”
Section: Spoken and Written Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adoption of the distinction between oral and literate culture as the given starting point, leading to a focus on the differences and conflicts between the two cultural traditions, is perhaps the major reason for the lopsidedness in literacy research. Against this dichotomous stance, some researchers have set up polar typologies which reify orality and literacy, putting their faith in the latter and, therefore, emphasizing its essential elements (for further discussion and critique of the typologies, see Akinnaso 1981Akinnaso , 1982aAkinnaso , 1985Street 1984;Finnegan 1988;Ewald 1988;Schousboe and Larsen 1989). Although all researchers agree that literacy involves major changes in forms of communication and the organization of knowledge, they do not agree on the social, political, economic, and, especially, cognitive consequences of these changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%