1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(81)80047-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The little finger superficialis—Clinical investigation of its anatomic and functional shortcomings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
26
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is comparable to other studies in Caucasian populations, which report a rate of absence of around 15-21% 101219. If we compare the deficiency of the FDS in the little finger with absent PL, the overall incidence is 4.15%, and it is statistically significant, while the sexwise distribution of weak FDS with absent PL was statistically significant in males and in females it was statistically insignificant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is comparable to other studies in Caucasian populations, which report a rate of absence of around 15-21% 101219. If we compare the deficiency of the FDS in the little finger with absent PL, the overall incidence is 4.15%, and it is statistically significant, while the sexwise distribution of weak FDS with absent PL was statistically significant in males and in females it was statistically insignificant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…First, full and free range of motion of the PIPJ of both little fingers was confirmed. FDS function in the little finger was assessed by standard and modified tests and divided into normal or weak FDS function 1013. Normal function was defined as the ability to flex the PIPJ of the little finger >90° with the PIPJ of the other fingers extended or when the ring finger PIPJ was also allowed to flex simultaneously.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among Nigerian populace, 31.25% subjects showed absence of PL, out of which 12.5% was recorded as unilateral absence while and 18.75% subjects recorded as bilateral absence of PL [16,17]. While many previous studies have conflicted with respect to the frequency of PL absence in connection to body side and gender [18][19][20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an Indian study, significant results were obtained showing the FDS weakness in the people who had PL absence, and, in addition, it was found with a more tendency towards the male population [24]. Baker et al, in 1981, found that the absence of the PL and the variation of the FDS showed independence results [25]. Fortunately, the PL absence and the FDS variations do not affect the hand function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%