The Lived Experience of Stop and Search in Scotland: There Are Two Sides to Every Story

Abstract

This article presents data emerging from ethnographic research that sought to explore the extent to which stop and search procedures in Scotland are underpinned by a focus on procedural justice and the impact they have on young people. Data were collected via participant observation of police deployments and semi-structured interviews with 23 law enforcement officers and 46 young people. The emerging insights suggested that differential views on and approaches to policing in different parts of the country were leading to varying experiences of stop and search and procedural justice. The young people interviewed in the east of the country had more positive relationships with the police and a stronger belief in procedural justice. Conversely, the tendency to use stop and search as a deterrent from crime in the west of Scotland resulted in deteriorated relationships, institutionalization of the use of the tactic, and a perceived lack of procedural justice.

Police stops in Germany – between legal rules and informal practices

“…Due to this asymmetric power-relationship backed by the law, police officers have considerably more power than the citizens during a police stop. Citizens feel that they have only limited options to influence the way in which officers carry out a control: they comply with police measures due to a sense of “dull compulsion” (Tankebe, 2009, p. 1280), resulting from unevenly distributed procedural fairness (Deuchar et al ., 2019, p. 432). Citizens who complain about police measures run the risk of being charged and sentenced for resistance or insult, while criminal cases against the officers are mostly dropped (Abdul-Rahman et al ., 2020; Singelnstein, 2014).…”