2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02295-1_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The LLL Algorithm and Integer Programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this contradicts with the well-known fact that det{B T B} is invariant for a given lattice. Similar work may be found in Ling and Mow [39], though they did not summarize their related work as clearly as we state in proposition 1 with the help of formulae (6a) to (8). Nevertheless, we should note that proposition 1 is still slightly different from the work of Ling and Mow [39] in two senses: (a) while Ling and Mow [39] directly implemented the sorted QR technique to re-arrange the basis vectors, we do not assume any sorting in proposition 1 and (b) as a result of (a), the proofs given here and in Ling and Mow [39] are essentially different.…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this contradicts with the well-known fact that det{B T B} is invariant for a given lattice. Similar work may be found in Ling and Mow [39], though they did not summarize their related work as clearly as we state in proposition 1 with the help of formulae (6a) to (8). Nevertheless, we should note that proposition 1 is still slightly different from the work of Ling and Mow [39] in two senses: (a) while Ling and Mow [39] directly implemented the sorted QR technique to re-arrange the basis vectors, we do not assume any sorting in proposition 1 and (b) as a result of (a), the proofs given here and in Ling and Mow [39] are essentially different.…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…. , b m in R n , the reduction by repeating the process from (6a) to (8) always converges in a finite number of iterations.…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then a number of lattice-based approaches have been proposed for integer linear programming problems, see e.g. the surveys [3,1] and the recent papers [26,4,34,31,2] among many others. Recent research has also considered convex quadratic objectives (as is the case for the ILS problem), see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Distance to Integrality and Size of the BB Tree Let x R denote the optimal solution to the RLS problem (2) and x I the solution to the ILS problem (1). We define the distance to integrality as the Euclidean distance between the real and integer optimal solutions to the ILS problem:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%