2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The local and global structure of knowledge production in an emergent research field: An exponential random graph analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 2 This sense of the "whole network" should not be confused with the technical term "complete graph," where every vertex has a direct edge to every other vertex. 3 [44] is still one of the best discussions of the interplay between the formal, statistical and substantive motivations for using exponential families.CONSISTENCY UNDER SAMPLING OF EXPONENTIAL GRAPHS 3 likelihood or pseudo-likelihood) to the observed sub-network, and then extrapolate the same model, with the same parameters, to the whole network; often this takes the form of interpreting the parameters as "provid [ing] information about the presence of structural effects observed in the network" [54], page 194, or the strength of different network-formation mechanisms; [2,16,17,24,25,55,62] are just a few of the more recent papers doing this. This obviously raises the question of the statistical (i.e., large sample) consistency of maximum likelihood estimation in this context.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 2 This sense of the "whole network" should not be confused with the technical term "complete graph," where every vertex has a direct edge to every other vertex. 3 [44] is still one of the best discussions of the interplay between the formal, statistical and substantive motivations for using exponential families.CONSISTENCY UNDER SAMPLING OF EXPONENTIAL GRAPHS 3 likelihood or pseudo-likelihood) to the observed sub-network, and then extrapolate the same model, with the same parameters, to the whole network; often this takes the form of interpreting the parameters as "provid [ing] information about the presence of structural effects observed in the network" [54], page 194, or the strength of different network-formation mechanisms; [2,16,17,24,25,55,62] are just a few of the more recent papers doing this. This obviously raises the question of the statistical (i.e., large sample) consistency of maximum likelihood estimation in this context.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table ). Either those publications achieve higher citation rates in general or this is due to a regional effect, a “home‐field advantage.” For instance, Gondal () showed in a smaller and topic‐specific study that many authors are cited by their region and Cronin () conducted a study wherein American authors had a much higher tendency to cite American publications rather than British authors. We tested this assumption in Appendix and were unable to confirm this.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these networks are called two‐mode networks, where nodes represent different entity types. For example, Gondal () built a citation network consisting of paper and author nodes, and examined citation patterns between papers and authors. Keegan, Gergle, and Contractor () studied a Wikipedia network consisting of editor and article nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have used ERGM to study knowledge diffusion in various domains, such as citation networks (Gondal, 2011), multicultural research collaborations (Sayogo, Zhang, & Pardo, 2011), organizational information seeking (Johnson, Kovács, & Vicsek, 2012;Su & Contractor, 2011), and medical innovation (Zappa & Mariani, 2011). Table 2 summarizes these works based on the network dimensionality and parameter estimation methods.…”
Section: Exponential Random Graph Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%