2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2016.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The local Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture for U(3)×U(2): The non-generic case

Abstract: The local Gan-Gross-Prasad conjecture of unitary groups, which is now settled by the works of Plessis, Gan and Ichino, says that for a pair of generic L-parameters of (U (n + 1), U (n)), there is a unique pair of representations in their associated Vogan L-packets which produces the Bessel model. In this paper, we examined the conjecture for a pair of L-parameters of U (n + 1), U (n) as fixing a special non-generic parameter of U (n + 1) and varing tempered L-parameters of U (n) and observed that there still e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is remarkable that for the supercuspidal L-parameter θ s (φ (1) , φ (2) ) with θ(φ (2) ) as above, the recipe, which is sugegsted in (FJ) 3 , does not occur from the theta lift from U (V ± 1 ) and U (V ± 2 ). This is quite similar with the Proposition 4.6 in [14], which concerns the non-generic aspect of Bessel case of the GGP conjecture.…”
Section: Sincesupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is remarkable that for the supercuspidal L-parameter θ s (φ (1) , φ (2) ) with θ(φ (2) ) as above, the recipe, which is sugegsted in (FJ) 3 , does not occur from the theta lift from U (V ± 1 ) and U (V ± 2 ). This is quite similar with the Proposition 4.6 in [14], which concerns the non-generic aspect of Bessel case of the GGP conjecture.…”
Section: Sincesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Now we shall consider the theta correspondence for U(V ǫ 1 ) × U(W ǫ ′ 3 ). The following is a compound of Theorem 3.4 and Theorem 3.5 in [14].…”
Section: If We Setmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Disregarding one-dimensional representations of , these A-parameters are of the form , with , one-dimensional characters that are conjugate dual of appropriate sign. This restriction problem has been studied in two papers [Haa16, Haa17] of Haan. His results are in accordance with the expectations of Conjecture 6.1.…”
Section: Low-rank Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Proposition 11.6 in [2], the non-vanishing of these two local zeta integral functions Z v,s=− 1 2 and Z v is equivalent to the non-vanishing of the local theta lifts Θ W1,v,V2,v (π 2,v ) and Θ W1,v,L1,v (µ v ) respectively. Since we assumed that theta lift [9] and it is the analog of the local Ichino-Ikeda conejctures for non-tempered case.…”
Section: The Rallis Inner Product Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%