The Local Space Density of Optically Selected Clusters of Galaxies

Abstract

We present here new results on the space density of rich, optically-selected, clusters of galaxies at low redshift (z < 0.15). These results are based on the application of the matched filter clusterfinding algorithm (as outlined by Postman et al. 1996 andKawasaki et al. 1998) to 1067deg 2 of the Edinburgh/Durham Southern Galaxy Catalogue (EDSGC). This is the first major application of this methodology at low redshift and in total, we have detected 2109 clusters above a richness cutoff of R m ≥ 50 (or Λ cl ≥ 10; Postman et al. 1996). This new catalogue of clusters is known as the Edinburgh/Durham Cluster Catalogue II (or EDCCII). We have used extensive Monte Carlo simulations to define the detection thresholds for our algorithm, to measure the effective area of the EDCCII and to determine our spurious detection rate. These simulations have shown that our detection efficiency is strongly correlated with the presence of large-scale structure in the EDSGC data. We believe this is due to the assumption of a flat, uniform background in the matched filter algorithm. Using these simulations, we are able to compute the space density of clusters in this new survey. We find 83.These three richness bands roughly correspond to Abell Richness Classes 0, 1 and ≥ 2 respectfully. These new measurements of the local space density of clusters are in agreement with those found at higher redshift (0.2 < z est < 0.6) in the Palomar Distant Cluster Survey (PDCS; Postman et al. 1996 and therefore, removes one of the major uncertainties associated with the PDCS as it had previously detected a factor of 5 ± 2 more clusters at high redshift than expected compared to the space density of low redshift Abell clusters. This discrepancy is now lessened and, at worst, is only a factor of 4 +10 −4 . This result illustrates the need to use the same cluster-finding algorithm at both high and low redshift to avoid such apparent discrepancies. We also confirm that the space density of clusters remains nearly constant out to z ∼ 0.6 in agreement with previous optical and X-ray measurements of the space density of clusters (Couch et al. 1991;Postman et al. 1996;Ebeling et al. 1997;Nichol et al. 1999). Finally, we have compared the EDCCII with the Abell catalogue. We detect nearly 60% of all Abell clusters in the EDCCII area regardless of their Abell Richness and Distance Classes. For clusters in common between the two surveys, we find no strong correlation between the two richness estimates in agreement with the work of Lumsden et al. (1992). In comparison, ∼ 90% of the EDCCII systems are new, although a majority of them have a richness lower than an Abell Richness Class of 0 and therefore, would be below Abell's original selection criteria. However, we do detect 143 new clusters with R m ≥ 100 (which corresponds to a Richness Class of greater than, or equal to, 0) that are not in the Abell catalogue i.e. 63% of the rich EDCCII systems. These numbers lend credence to the idea that the Abell catalogue may be incomplete, especially at lower richnesses.

The DPOSS II distant compact group survey: the EMMI-NTT spectroscopic sample

“…(1) of Lee et al (2004). Our isolated compact groups have a density of 1 × 10 −6 Mpc −3 , similar to the values measured for clusters of galaxies (Bramel et al 2000) and fossil groups (Santos et al 2007;Jones et al 2003).…”

A deep Hαsurvey of galaxies in the two nearby clusters Abell 1367 and Coma

“…For Abell type 2 clusters, like Abell 1367 and Coma, this value was reported to be 1.84 × 10 −5 Mpc −3 (Bramel et al 2000), although this number is affected by large uncertainties. We conclude that the typical contribution of Abell type 2 clusters to the SF R per unit volume is about 3.3 × 10 −5 M yr −1 , that is 0.25% of the total SF R in the local Universe.…”

SDSS-RASS: Next Generation of Cluster-Finding Algorithms

“…These new methods include the matched-filter algorithm (Postman et al 1996, Kawasaki et al 1998, Kepner et al 1999, Bramel et al 2000), the wavelet-filter (Slezak et al 1990), the "photometric redshift" method (Kodama et al 1999), and the "density-morphology" relationship (Ostrander et al 1998) or the E/S0 ridge-line (Gladders & Yee 2000).…”