This study explores how environmental, organizational and individual factors combine to influence the employee voice of older local government workers in five councils in the North of England. It is built on a multiphase qualitative research design, using 36 semi-structured interviews, an observation and a workshop. Guided by critical theory and a cross-paradigmatic approach, the research draws on the perspectives of a stratified sample of participants to consider whether older workers have a consistently fair and equitable employee voice. Participants include leaders, managers, trade unionists and older workers. The findings are presented according to five key themes established using template analysis, relating firstly to the local government context; secondly human resource management practice; thirdly local government employee voice; fourthly the older worker's perception of voice and fifthly the significance of age to employee voice.The research finds that older workers are a heterogeneous group, who value direct forms of employee voice as a source of recognition and identity. Factors including role, disability and employment contract type, intersect to disadvantage certain employees, so supporting the legitimacy of the collective voice of the trade unions. Organizational factors restricting employee voice originate in new public management practices, such as the outsourcing that disrupts voice channels, and human resource management that has an increasingly managerial and unitarist outlook. A hierarchy of managerial hegemonies, with central government at the pinnacle and local government below, emphasise performance enhancing employee voice over social justice mechanisms.Organizational factors expediting employee voice in the councils are the traditionally pluralist employment relations, public sector ethos and an embedded respect for equality and diversity.The research concludes that as a component of an open system, external environmental factors are most significant to the employee voice of older workers. These include austerity, societal ageism, an incoherent central government strategy for older workers, weak equality legislation and unfavourable pension regulations.