2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-1037-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The logic and challenges of imaging sarcoidosis with whole body FDG PET

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnosis is confirmed by either a cardiac MRI illustrating focal delayed enhancement or a PET scan showing focal cardiac avidity in a non -ischemic distribution in conjunction with the presence of noncaseating granulomas in a non-cardiac location. Endomyocardial biopsy is insensitive because of the focal or patchy distribution of the granulomas [45][46][47][48]. Neurosarcoidosis can be diagnosed with a positive tissue biopsy outside of the neural network but only if other etiologies for the neurologic diagnosis are ruled out and the neurologic involvement is leptomeningeal or a cranial neuropathy, the former of which shows gadolinium enhancement [33,44].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis is confirmed by either a cardiac MRI illustrating focal delayed enhancement or a PET scan showing focal cardiac avidity in a non -ischemic distribution in conjunction with the presence of noncaseating granulomas in a non-cardiac location. Endomyocardial biopsy is insensitive because of the focal or patchy distribution of the granulomas [45][46][47][48]. Neurosarcoidosis can be diagnosed with a positive tissue biopsy outside of the neural network but only if other etiologies for the neurologic diagnosis are ruled out and the neurologic involvement is leptomeningeal or a cranial neuropathy, the former of which shows gadolinium enhancement [33,44].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%