Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although most geoscientists do not recognise the ancestry of this debate, their concerns are very much in line with the division of sciences and appropriate methodology outlined by Rickert (1986). Rather than having the subsuming of the individual event under some universal explanation as their goal, the reduction of an individual event to a 'law' (Leighton 1904), geoscientists wish to understand and interpret reality in its singularity and individuality. The preoccupation of geoscientists with history means that, although they may refer to the 'laws' of physics and chemistry in their explanations, their aims and methods of explanation are peculiar to an historical science, a science concerned with the concrete (Rickert 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most geoscientists do not recognise the ancestry of this debate, their concerns are very much in line with the division of sciences and appropriate methodology outlined by Rickert (1986). Rather than having the subsuming of the individual event under some universal explanation as their goal, the reduction of an individual event to a 'law' (Leighton 1904), geoscientists wish to understand and interpret reality in its singularity and individuality. The preoccupation of geoscientists with history means that, although they may refer to the 'laws' of physics and chemistry in their explanations, their aims and methods of explanation are peculiar to an historical science, a science concerned with the concrete (Rickert 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%