The passing of Fikret Şenses on January 20, 2023 after a long battle with cancer has left a void in the social sciences in Turkey in more ways than one. Şenses was a much loved and revered professor of economics at the Middle East Technical University (METU) for over 40 years and a member of New Perspective on Turkey's Editorial Board.Dr. Şenses was born in 1947 in Samsun. He graduated from the Samsun Maarif Koleji as the valedictorian of his class. He then went on to obtain his bachelor's, master's and PhD degrees in economics from the University of Warwick, University of Lancaster and the London School of Economics and Political Science, respectively. After a short stint at the Research Department of the Central Bank of Turkey, he started his life-long academic career at METU's Department of Economics in 1980. Here he served in various academic and administrative positions, including department chairman and elected member of the University Senate. He was the editor of the faculty journal, METU Studies in Development, between 1983 and 1987. He collected an array of awards both for his teaching and research, including ones from the Turkish Academy of Sciences and the Turkish Economics Association. He was a visiting scholar at Harvard, Sussex, and Columbia Universities and also at the Institute of Developing Economies, Tokyo.Fikret Şenses had an unshakeable belief in the possibility and, more importantly, the necessity of making the world a better place for the most disadvantaged, a belief which also led him to work on questions of economic development, poverty, and inequality. He authored numerous books and articles emphasizing the humane and societal facets of the economic policies of developing countries and the transformations they go through.Prof. Şenses' early work focused on two areas that were critical for the developing countries: industrialization strategy and stabilization and structural adjustment policies. His work on industrialization made the case for a return to a planned economy but using a South Korean-style industrialization strategy where the selective and temporary incentivization of certain sectors and the close monitoring of the performance of incentivized firms were the main ingredients, instead of an overall big push strategy that aims for an across-the-board development of all sectors (Şenses, 1989, 1990, 1993a). Even though his recommendations did not rouse much interest amongst policy makers at a time when laissez-faire had become the motto, the relevance of his recommendations has been rendered more obvious via the recent discussions in the literature around the notions of developmentalist state and premature deindustrialization of developing countries.