1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-3796(99)00008-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The long-length line for jacketing cable-in-conduit conductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If the sliding friction between the jacket and cable is the same for the JAEA and Russian insertions, then a maximum pulling force of 32 kN for the 760 m Cu dummy conductor is a reasonable value, taking into account the 33% increase in unit length weight of the JAEA conductor compared to the Russian Cu dummy conductor. Russian data indicates a saturation of the pulling force at around 23 kN after 500 m. This saturation may be due to a drop in the imperfections in the cable and jacket as a result of an increase in the pulling force, such that the contact area of the cable and jacket approaches an ideal position and the sliding friction force decreases [2]. In the case of the present qualification, we think that the cable and jacket were in a nearly ideal position at the outset due to the straightening of the cable and jacket prior to cable insertion.…”
Section: Cable Insertionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If the sliding friction between the jacket and cable is the same for the JAEA and Russian insertions, then a maximum pulling force of 32 kN for the 760 m Cu dummy conductor is a reasonable value, taking into account the 33% increase in unit length weight of the JAEA conductor compared to the Russian Cu dummy conductor. Russian data indicates a saturation of the pulling force at around 23 kN after 500 m. This saturation may be due to a drop in the imperfections in the cable and jacket as a result of an increase in the pulling force, such that the contact area of the cable and jacket approaches an ideal position and the sliding friction force decreases [2]. In the case of the present qualification, we think that the cable and jacket were in a nearly ideal position at the outset due to the straightening of the cable and jacket prior to cable insertion.…”
Section: Cable Insertionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The nominal gap between the jacket and cable is 1.5-2 mm for ITER CS and TF model coil conductor fabrication [2,4]. Taking into account the dimensional tolerances of the TF conductor cable (41.8 + 0.2/−0.3 mm) and jacket, we have chosen a jacket nominal inner diameter of 44.2 mm.…”
Section: Dimensional Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Jacketing experiences [4][5][6] show that the eff is from 0.5 to 0.7. The weight of the EF-H cable which is the heaviest cable was expected to be 1097 kg at design phase.…”
Section: Pulling Force For Cable Insertionmentioning
confidence: 99%