Beyond Observation 2020
DOI: 10.7765/9781526147295.00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The long prehistory of ethnographic film

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“… 27. Lewis, David, Dennis Rodgers and Michael Woolcock (2014), “Introduction: popular representations of development”, in David Lewis, Dennis Rodgers and Michael Woolcock (editors), Popular Representations of Development , Routledge, London, pages 3–15, page 3; also Harman, Sophie (2016), “Film as research method in African politics and international relations: reading and writing HIV/AIDs in Tanzania”, African Affairs Vol 115, No 461, pages 733–756; and Henley, Paul (2020), Beyond Observation: A History of Authorship in Ethnographic Film , Manchester University Press, Manchester. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 27. Lewis, David, Dennis Rodgers and Michael Woolcock (2014), “Introduction: popular representations of development”, in David Lewis, Dennis Rodgers and Michael Woolcock (editors), Popular Representations of Development , Routledge, London, pages 3–15, page 3; also Harman, Sophie (2016), “Film as research method in African politics and international relations: reading and writing HIV/AIDs in Tanzania”, African Affairs Vol 115, No 461, pages 733–756; and Henley, Paul (2020), Beyond Observation: A History of Authorship in Ethnographic Film , Manchester University Press, Manchester. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his history of the ethnographic film, Paul Henley (2020, p. 284) notes that ethnographic film-makers face a central dilemma while deciding how best to render cinematically intelligible any ‘subject that is culturally unfamiliar to [one or the other of their intended] audiences.’ For they must walk the tightrope between providing too much of extra-filmic explanation, which is bound to transform film into illustrated lecture, and too little of it, which might prime audiences unfamiliar with the subject to ‘fill [the] vacuum of incomprehension with their own, usually ethnocentric, interpretations’ (Henley, 2020, p. 284).…”
Section: Form Content and The Burden Of Intelligibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, the filmic enactment of social movements has displayed considerable variation—ranging from earnest portrayals of movement voices and faces to multilayered re/presentations of film-maker and filmed, of spaces and aims of political intervention, and of emotional and affective interactions between mobiliser and mobilised. To locate Sangharsh vis-à-vis established lineages of documentary and ethnographic cinema (as noted, say, in Henley, 2020; Waugh, 2011), let us examine the characterisation of the activists whose ensemble casting lends this film its three-act structure.…”
Section: Form Content and The Burden Of Intelligibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his opinion, a laborious gestation would run from the mid-1890s up to the Second World War, "a period of tentative beginnings, sporadic activity and blurred genres". 68 Captions…”
Section: Figs 11-12mentioning
confidence: 99%