2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2019.04.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The long-run relationship between finance and income inequality: Evidence from panel data

Abstract: We use heterogeneous panel cointegration techniques to examine the long-run effect of financial development on income inequality in a panel of 119 countries from 1980 to 2015. We include real GDP per capita in the cointegration relation and explicitly deal with cross-sectional dependence in the data that arises due to unobserved common factors. On average, financial development reduces income inequality in the long-run, with the result robust to different measures of finance and across country income groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, at the initial stage of economic development, only the high-income individual, elites and firms access the benefits from the financial development and markets. This is partly due to imperfections, frictions, market failure and poor institutional framework associated with the initial development in the financial markets as currently witnessed in developing economies and Africa in particular (Law et al , 2014; Thornton and Tommaso, 2020). However, as the financial markets become more developed, the imperfections are reduced and then a large proportion of the society including the poor can access the benefits emanating from the financial development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, at the initial stage of economic development, only the high-income individual, elites and firms access the benefits from the financial development and markets. This is partly due to imperfections, frictions, market failure and poor institutional framework associated with the initial development in the financial markets as currently witnessed in developing economies and Africa in particular (Law et al , 2014; Thornton and Tommaso, 2020). However, as the financial markets become more developed, the imperfections are reduced and then a large proportion of the society including the poor can access the benefits emanating from the financial development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, in the United States, Bittencourt et al (2019) state that the effect of financial development seems to differ according to the level of inequality in each state, with the effect increasing in states with above‐average inequality, while an inverted U‐shaped relationship is observed in states with below‐average inequality. Some studies show favorable results that validate a financial Kuznets hypothesis (Gharleghi & Jahanshahi, 2020; Thornton & Tommaso, 2020; Van Velthoven et al, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The effect of financial development on economic growth and the effect of economic growth on income inequality have been explored by Greenwood and Javonavic (1990). Following these studies, Bittencourt (2010); Kappel (2010); Shahbaz and Islam (2011); Tan and Law (2012); Akbiyik (2012); Kanberoğlu and Arvas (2014); Shahbaz et al (2014); In the studies conducted by Support et al (2017); Anggraeni and Nugroho (2020); Thornton and Tommaso (2020); Support et al, (2020); Kuscuoglu and Cicek (2021); Rachmawati et al, (2021) On the other hand, studies by Sehrawat and Giri (2015), Akıncı and Akıncı (2016), Topuz and Dağdemir (2016), and Jung and Cha (2021) reveal that financial development has an increasing effect on income inequality. On the other hand, Shari (2000), Nolan and Maitre (2008), Rubin and Segal (2015) argue that economic growth has an increasing effect on income Financial Development and Income Inequality in Countries Murat TEKBAŞ 719 inequality and they state that it has a positive effect in urban areas.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%