1994
DOI: 10.1080/87565649409540586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The long‐term consequences of periventricular brain damage on language and verbal memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sentence comprehension and cognitive abilities have been shown to be poor in children sustaining structural brain lesion in the neonatal period [29,30], and disabilities in language comprehension were also prominent in the present preterm group relative to the control group. Although extremely low birth weight children without damage to the periventricular region of the brain have been shown to be indistinguishable from their agematched peers [29], no comparison of this kind could be made here because of the high proportion of children with structural changes in neonatal brain MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sentence comprehension and cognitive abilities have been shown to be poor in children sustaining structural brain lesion in the neonatal period [29,30], and disabilities in language comprehension were also prominent in the present preterm group relative to the control group. Although extremely low birth weight children without damage to the periventricular region of the brain have been shown to be indistinguishable from their agematched peers [29], no comparison of this kind could be made here because of the high proportion of children with structural changes in neonatal brain MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Although extremely low birth weight children without damage to the periventricular region of the brain have been shown to be indistinguishable from their agematched peers [29], no comparison of this kind could be made here because of the high proportion of children with structural changes in neonatal brain MRI. Even though intellectual disabilities could be the primary or only cause of deficient language comprehension, we suggest that this was not the case in our series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This phenomenon might be explained by the relationship between ‘the moment/age of acquisition’ [14] and ‘consolidation process of lexical-semantic knowledge’ in the vocabulary learning. Regarding the moment of acquisition, loss of newly acquired function was reported in populations with traumatic brain injury [15] and children with brain damage [10]. Also, in bilingualism [16], the first acquired language would be less affected by brain damage whereas the second language would be affected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vocabulary acquisition, NC may learn some words earlier than others. Brain damage may affect newly acquired information first [10]. Based on these observations, we hypothesized that demented elderly may maintain vocabulary acquired earlier in life better than vocabulary acquired later in life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In preschoolers, language delays are common. By school age, however, vocabulary and receptive language are not as compromised as are non-verbal skills (e.g., Frisk & Whyte, 1994;Ment, Vohr, Allan, & Peterson, 2003;Taylor, Burant, & Holding, 2002), although some investigators have noted deficiencies on more complex verbal tasks, such as syntax. Not surprisingly, these cognitive skill deficits contribute to the routinely observed academic difficulties in children born preterm (e.g., Taylor, Hack, Klein, & Schatschneider, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%