2021
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10040707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Long-Term Effectiveness of Omalizumab in Adult Patients with Severe Allergic Asthma: Continuous Treatment Versus Boosting Treatment

Abstract: The implications of boosting Omalizumab treatment (OT) in patients with severe allergic asthma (SAA) remain unclear. The study aimed to explore and compare the 12-month effectiveness between continuous, at least 10-month OT (continuation group) and four-month boost of Omalizumab (boost group) in adult patients with SAA. In this retrospective cohort study, clinical data were collected for further analysis. Of all participants (n = 124), a significant reduction in annual exacerbations (baseline = 0.8 ± 1.5, foll… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 128 patients with SAA who applied for reimbursements for omalizumab during the study period, 124 received approval and were included in the final analysis. Among the 124 enrollees, 110 patients received omalizumab treatment for at least 10 months during the 1-year follow-up period while 14 subjects received only 4 months of omalizumab because of the administrative issue from the Taiwan NHI ( 8 ). Only 75 and 85 patients had binary results of lung function measurements and ACT scores, respectively, at enrollment and the end of the 1-year follow-up period for further investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Of the 128 patients with SAA who applied for reimbursements for omalizumab during the study period, 124 received approval and were included in the final analysis. Among the 124 enrollees, 110 patients received omalizumab treatment for at least 10 months during the 1-year follow-up period while 14 subjects received only 4 months of omalizumab because of the administrative issue from the Taiwan NHI ( 8 ). Only 75 and 85 patients had binary results of lung function measurements and ACT scores, respectively, at enrollment and the end of the 1-year follow-up period for further investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was conducted at TCVGH, a tertiary referral center in central Taiwan, be-tween January 2010 and January 2019, and enrolled patients diagnosed of SAA who applied for reimbursements for omalizumab from the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) according to the judgment of very experienced pulmonologists and immunologists in charge of asthma management. Patients whose applications were not ap-proved were excluded from this study ( 8 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Continuing the therapeutic theme, Huang and colleagues investigated the long-term efficacy of an anti-IgE antibody, Omalizumab, in a cohort of patients with severe allergic asthma [ 30 ]. Omalizumab comes under the class of medications called monoclonal antibodies [ 31 , 32 , 33 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%