2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The long-term impact of restorative justice programming for juvenile offenders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
70
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
70
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Advocates suggest that school-based restorative justice programs signal a caring and safe climate organized around forgiveness, respectful dialogue, responsibility, and community participation (Braithwaite, 1999). Although there is some evidence that restorative justice can reduce serious assaults and other forms of violence in individuals already involved in the criminal justice system (Strang, Sherman, Mayo-Wilson, Woods, & Ariel, 2013;Bergseth & Bouffard, 2007), the type of randomized trials needed to establish the effectiveness of this approach in reducing school based-violence has not yet been undertaken.…”
Section: Daniel B Neillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advocates suggest that school-based restorative justice programs signal a caring and safe climate organized around forgiveness, respectful dialogue, responsibility, and community participation (Braithwaite, 1999). Although there is some evidence that restorative justice can reduce serious assaults and other forms of violence in individuals already involved in the criminal justice system (Strang, Sherman, Mayo-Wilson, Woods, & Ariel, 2013;Bergseth & Bouffard, 2007), the type of randomized trials needed to establish the effectiveness of this approach in reducing school based-violence has not yet been undertaken.…”
Section: Daniel B Neillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies are often marred by small sample sizes, lack of representation of study populations, absence of experimental controls, and non-comparable definitions of recidivism. In addition, many studies focus on process measures, in particular experiences of fairness and restoration, without considering outcomes such as recidivism (Baffour, 2006;Bergseth & Bouffard, 2007;Bonta, Wallace-Capretta, Rooney & McAnoy, 2002;McCold & Wachtel, 2000). It is also important to keep in mind that results are influenced by self-selection bias, since programmes are voluntary and participants may be more motivated to ensure positive outcomes (Hudson, 2002;Latimer, Dowden & Muise, 2005).…”
Section: Evidence On the Outcomes Of Restorative Mediationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greater part of investigations, including three meta-analyses, suggests that about a third (28-34%) of offenders recidivate following participation in restorative programmes; in experimental studies the majority of offenders were less likely to reoffend when compared to control groups (Bergseth & Bouffard, 2007;Bonta, Jesseman, Rugge & Cormier, 2006;Bonta et al, 2002;Bradshaw et al, 2006;Latimer et al, 2005;Rodriguez, 2007). In general, victims and offenders express high levels of satisfaction with the mediation process (Bonta et al, 2006;Bradshaw et al, 2006;McCold & Wachtel, 2000;Mutter & Dugmore, 2008;Umbreit & Fercello, 1997;Wemmers & Cyr, 2005).…”
Section: Evidence On the Outcomes Of Restorative Mediationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The restorative justice umbrella shelters a range of practices, such as victim-offender mediation, community reparative boards, family group conferencing and circle sentencing (Bergseth & Bouffard, 2007). In this article, we limit our focus to victimoffender mediation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%