2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)00923-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The long-term outcome of glaucoma filtration surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if only phakic patients were considered, the rate increased to 42.9%, which falls within the range of cataract formation or progression reported in the literature. 28,29 There was no significant difference between the rates of cataract development, progression, or cataract operation after trabeculectomy between the Asian American and Caucasian groups. It is possible that both the Asian Americans and Caucasian patients in our tertiary care setting were more receptive to the option of cataract surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, if only phakic patients were considered, the rate increased to 42.9%, which falls within the range of cataract formation or progression reported in the literature. 28,29 There was no significant difference between the rates of cataract development, progression, or cataract operation after trabeculectomy between the Asian American and Caucasian groups. It is possible that both the Asian Americans and Caucasian patients in our tertiary care setting were more receptive to the option of cataract surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We observed progression of glaucomatous field defects in 41% of the eyes during the follow-up of 2-5 years (mean 3.5 years) after trabeculectomy. Progression rates of VF defects have varied considerably, partly due to different criteria of VF loss, partly due to different length of follow-up; the probability of progressive field loss at 4-5 years' follow-up has been reported in 25-27% [22,23], at 7-10 years in 27-76% [4,11,20,25,27] and at 11-15 years in 46-68% [15,21]. The fairly high progression rate in our series may be explained partly by the high proportion of severe VF defects before surgery (40% of preoperative VFs) and, partly, by One eye fulfilled also VF criteria for blindness too high postoperative IOP level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Parc et al reported that 46% of posttrabeculectomy eyes that went blind had an IOP of 14 mm Hg compared to a mean of 15.4 mm Hg in those eyes not going blind. 39 CIGTS showed that despite a 48% reduction in IOP in the trabeculectomy eyes, there was more visual field loss progression in this group than that occurred in the medically treated eyes, which only had a 35% reduction in IOP. 40 Even in the Moorfields' Primary Treatment Trial, when fields were tested with automated perimetry, there was no difference in progression of field loss between the medically treated eyes (mean IOP of 19 mm Hg) and the trabeculectomy eyes (mean IOP of 14 mm Hg).…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%