2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2022.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The long-term prognostic value of E/e’ in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with our result, Gong et al [17] showed statistically significant difference between MACE and no MACE groups as regards mean LVEF (46.1 ± 6.9% vs. 52.3 ± 9.0% with p value= 0.009) and mean LVESV, which was higher in MACE group (76.1±15.6 ml vs. 61.9±18.2 ml with p-value= 0.002). Also, Park et al [18] evaluated the long-term prognostic significance of E/e' in STEMI patients and found that those with an aberrant E/e' ratio (>15) had a considerably larger percentage of MACEs than those with a normal E/e' ratio (34.8% vs. 12.7%, p 0.001). Patients in that study were subdivided according to E/e' ratio into two groups (E/e' > 15 and E/e' < 15) and showed statistically significant higher mean E wave velocity (87.37 ± 25.88 cm/s vs. 62.65 ± 16.57 cm/s, with p value < 0.001) and lower mean septal e' wave velocity (4.21 ± 0.17 cm/s vs. 6.43 ± 0.12 cm/s, with p-value < 0.001) in patients with E/e' > 15.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with our result, Gong et al [17] showed statistically significant difference between MACE and no MACE groups as regards mean LVEF (46.1 ± 6.9% vs. 52.3 ± 9.0% with p value= 0.009) and mean LVESV, which was higher in MACE group (76.1±15.6 ml vs. 61.9±18.2 ml with p-value= 0.002). Also, Park et al [18] evaluated the long-term prognostic significance of E/e' in STEMI patients and found that those with an aberrant E/e' ratio (>15) had a considerably larger percentage of MACEs than those with a normal E/e' ratio (34.8% vs. 12.7%, p 0.001). Patients in that study were subdivided according to E/e' ratio into two groups (E/e' > 15 and E/e' < 15) and showed statistically significant higher mean E wave velocity (87.37 ± 25.88 cm/s vs. 62.65 ± 16.57 cm/s, with p value < 0.001) and lower mean septal e' wave velocity (4.21 ± 0.17 cm/s vs. 6.43 ± 0.12 cm/s, with p-value < 0.001) in patients with E/e' > 15.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, limited data exists on the predictive value of follow‐up GLS and other strain parameters such as GCS. Furthermore, diastolic dysfunction assessed by E/e’ ratio obtained from tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) has been shown to predict LV remodeling after STEMI 17,18 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, diastolic dysfunction assessed by E/e' ratio obtained from tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) has been shown to predict LV remodeling after STEMI. 17,18 The objective of this study was to identify convenient reproducible echocardiographic predictors of LVEF recovery in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI, with a focus on strain parameters, as well as assessing the importance of early follow-up echo assessment, to help identify high-risk patients for adverse LV remodeling who can benefit from intensified post-infarction therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%