2016
DOI: 10.1177/1461444815624181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The longitudinal relation between online and offline political participation among youth at two different developmental stages

Abstract: The role played by the Internet in young people’s political lives has received great research attention. However, two gaps in the literature hinder the drawing of conclusions on how online political participation is related to its offline counterpart. First, although there are multiple hypotheses on the nature of the relationship, they have not been compared in any single study. Second, although the relation may differ according to developmental stage, age differences have not been examined. We address these g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
48
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, while not a central focus of this study, the relationship between online political activity and offline political activity is also worthy of attention (see especially, Kim, Russo, & Amnå, 2017). Some scholars find that online and offline political activity are relatively independent (e.g., Emmer, Wolling, & Vowe, 2012), others find that online political engagement leads to greater offline political participation (Bode, Vraga, Borah, & Shah, 2014;Gil de Zúñiga et al, 2014), and some find online and offline participation to be reciprocally reinforcing (e.g., Harlow & Harp, 2012;Vissers & Stolle, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Finally, while not a central focus of this study, the relationship between online political activity and offline political activity is also worthy of attention (see especially, Kim, Russo, & Amnå, 2017). Some scholars find that online and offline political activity are relatively independent (e.g., Emmer, Wolling, & Vowe, 2012), others find that online political engagement leads to greater offline political participation (Bode, Vraga, Borah, & Shah, 2014;Gil de Zúñiga et al, 2014), and some find online and offline participation to be reciprocally reinforcing (e.g., Harlow & Harp, 2012;Vissers & Stolle, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our evidence suggests that populist attitudes can be an important motivating factor for becoming more politically engaged in non-institutional expressive modes of participation such as petition signing (mostly done online) and the online expression of political opinions. While it may seem that the relevance of these two modes is smaller than that of others, research shows that, typically, online participation is positively related to and precedes other offline modes of political engagement (Conroy, Feezell and Guerrero, 2012;Gil de Zúñiga, Jung and Valenzuela, 2012;Vissers and Stolle, 2014;Kim, Russo and Amna, 2017). Online participation can thus be a stepping stone for additional engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, existing research provides robust support that digital participation encourages offline participation (e.g. Kim et al, 2017).…”
Section: Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%