1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199707)19:4<297::aid-hed8>3.0.co;2-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The longus colli muscle flap for reconstruction of the lateral pharyngeal wall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients usually present with advanced disease. Therefore, if surgery is the primary treatment, the majority of patients will receive adjuvant radiotherapy 6–8. Regardless of the treatment strategy, the likelihood of cure has been low, compared with squamous cell carcinomas arising elsewhere in the head and neck 9–15…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients usually present with advanced disease. Therefore, if surgery is the primary treatment, the majority of patients will receive adjuvant radiotherapy 6–8. Regardless of the treatment strategy, the likelihood of cure has been low, compared with squamous cell carcinomas arising elsewhere in the head and neck 9–15…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rees et al used seven pectoralis flaps when closing chronic esophageal fistulas after tumor resections in cancer patients [ 8 ]. The longus colli muscle can also be used for closure of defects in the lateral pharyngeal wall or pyriform but it introduces the risk of injury to the cervical sympathetic trunk [ 9 ]. Moreover, Reid et al claimed that the omental free flap provides more successful outcomes than the pedicle flap for the closure of esophageal fistula after spinal surgery [ 10 ] this flap presents greater risks of microvascular thrombosis and loss of the flap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of soft tissue reinforcement includes an omental free flap, a pectoralis muscle, a longus coli muscle, or an SCM muscle flap. 6,[17][18][19] Proper flap selection is important to avoid flap strain and to provide sufficient coverage of the perforation. Primary closure with an SCM muscle flap is considered the standard surgical treatment for esophageal perforation, because the SCM is close to the cervical esophagus, is easy mobilized, and is sufficient to cover most esophageal defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Collins reported good results for a longus colli muscle reconstructive flap in 16 patients with defects of the lateral pharyngeal wall or pyriform. 18 This flap is easily transferred from its anatomical location and preserves SCM muscle function, but it introduces the risk of injury to the cervical sympathetic trunk. 18 Moreover, although Reid et al claimed that the omental free flap provides more successful outcomes than the pedicle flap for the closure of esophageal fistula after spinal surgery, 20 this flap presents greater risks of microvascular thrombosis and total flap loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%