2019
DOI: 10.1080/23268743.2019.1590226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The lost inches: circumcision debates in gay men’s magazines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A magazine like Sexology , while certainly “sensational”—and we cannot deny this as undoubtedly this is part of why it sold—was, we might suggest, also responding to ongoing societal and cultural concerns about circumcision, amongst a range of sexual topics. These same concerns continue to appear in magazines, for instance, Hustler published articles on circumcision (Allan, 2018), and a range of gay male pornographic publications have also taken up the issue (Allan, 2019b). This article, however, is one of the first to consider as much of a print run as possible and to look at how the debates shifted over the course of several decades.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A magazine like Sexology , while certainly “sensational”—and we cannot deny this as undoubtedly this is part of why it sold—was, we might suggest, also responding to ongoing societal and cultural concerns about circumcision, amongst a range of sexual topics. These same concerns continue to appear in magazines, for instance, Hustler published articles on circumcision (Allan, 2018), and a range of gay male pornographic publications have also taken up the issue (Allan, 2019b). This article, however, is one of the first to consider as much of a print run as possible and to look at how the debates shifted over the course of several decades.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This debate has unfolded in newspapers, parenting manuals, medical studies, and policy papers, and opinions seem to be constantly in flux. The debates are deeply divided so much so that since about 1980, we have witnessed the rise of organized anti-circumcision activism, or intactivism (being a portmanteau of "intact" and "activism") in North America (Allan, 2018(Allan, , 2019a(Allan, , 2019bKennedy & Sardi, 2016;Sardi, 2011Sardi, , 2014. In her work, Carpenter has explored the medicalization, demedicalization, and remedicalization of circumcision.…”
Section: Medicalized Circumcisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Books about puberty present an interesting and important space to consider debates about the foreskin. These debates are no longer limited to the pages of scientific journals but rather are found in books about puberty, the material of this article, but also sex manuals, parenting manuals, news media, and magazines, including pornographic magazines (Allan 2018(Allan , 2019b(Allan , 2021Carpenter 2010). Throughout this study, it has been demonstrated that puberty manuals tend to explain what circumcision is, provide various reasons for why it is done, and ultimately try to assure their readers that a circumcised penis is no better than an uncircumcised penis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be certain, anti-circumcision movements are not without their critiques, and some scholars have highlighted the problematic elements of the movement, notably the comparison between female genital mutilation and male circumcision (for critiques, see Silverman, 2004;Kennedy, 2016;Osserman, 2021). I am arguing here, as I have elsewhere (Allan, 2018(Allan, , 2019(Allan, , 2021, that pornographic texts were and continue to be central in debates surrounding the foreskin and play an important role in the history of intactivism.…”
Section: Restoration and Early Intactivism In Fqmentioning
confidence: 93%