Ultra-low seismic frequencies less than about 7 Hz cannot be produced by conventional air gun arrays, for any configuration and for any towing depth. There is a profound difference between improving low-frequency recovery by removing source and receiver ghosts (achievable) and improving lowfrequency injection on the source side (an unrealised dream).If 1-7 Hz amplitudes could be usefully injected into the earth, it would be possible to facilitate much sharper seismic representation of geological contacts and internal features, and seismic inversion would yield robust and precise predictions of reservoir properties-without well control. The net result is fewer exploration and appraisal wells, greatly reduced exploration and development risks, and optimised recoverable reserves.Furthermore, an emerging seismic pursuit known as full waveform inversion (FWI) makes the bold promise that raw seismic field gathers can be directly used to invert for the highest achievable velocity models, almost without any human intervention. These models will bypass the traditional lack of low-frequency information in band-limited seismic data, and facilitate the aforementioned ambition of seismic inversion without well control. FWI, however, is confronted by the paradox that ultra-low-frequency seismic gathers are the necessary input for stable results. This paper describes new technologies that may enable the injection of strong 2-7 Hz amplitudes into the earth, and explains in simple terms how FWI can already be pursued as a robust complement to the prediction of accurate reservoir properties.The low-frequency revolution is already here.
KEYWORDSLow-frequency, ghosts, deghosting, dual-sensor, seismic inversion, FWI, reservoir characterisation, seismic.
INTRODUCTIONConventional air gun source arrays used for towed streamer (marine) seismic surveys cannot produce significant amplitudes below about 7 Hz. This 0-7 Hz range will be referred to as 'ultralow frequencies' . Although it may be counterintuitive, ultra-low frequency amplitudes can greatly improve vertical (temporal) seismic resolution, as demonstrated in Figure 1. Assuming that equal amplitudes are recovered in processing for all frequencies of relevance, additional low-frequency amplitudes will significantly attenuate sidelobe amplitudes on the zero phase wavelet representing elastic impedance boundaries in the earth. Note also in Figure 1 how additional low-frequency amplitudes do not affect the width of the central event. Overall, the interference between neighbouring reflection events in vertical columns of thin stratified layers will be minimised, thus optimising vertical resolution.Ultra-low frequency amplitudes are also critical for quantitatively precise estimation of elastic reservoir properties, which will be discussed later. Figure 2 is a comparison of two-dimensional towed streamer results over the Møre Margin area of the Norwegian North Sea. Note how the additional low-frequency amplitudes recovered in the ghost-free data have contributed to reduced sidel...