2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The low-iron, reduced surface of Mercury as seen in spectral reflectance by MESSENGER

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
152
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
4
152
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We calculated spectral slope (VISr, the ratio of reflectance at 430 nm to that at 750 nm) by division of one image by the other. This measure of visible spectral slope is comparable with that used for VISr in MASCS data by Izenberg et al (2014Izenberg et al ( , 2015 (415 nm / 750 nm) (Figure 1). We coregistered higher-resolution NAC images with the WAC data, and used these to identify regions that correspond to the specific unit types listed in Table 2 (Figure 3).…”
Section: Spectral Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We calculated spectral slope (VISr, the ratio of reflectance at 430 nm to that at 750 nm) by division of one image by the other. This measure of visible spectral slope is comparable with that used for VISr in MASCS data by Izenberg et al (2014Izenberg et al ( , 2015 (415 nm / 750 nm) (Figure 1). We coregistered higher-resolution NAC images with the WAC data, and used these to identify regions that correspond to the specific unit types listed in Table 2 (Figure 3).…”
Section: Spectral Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Analyses have therefore relied on spectral reflectance data at low spectral but moderately high spatial resolution from the Mercury Dual Imaging System (MDIS) (11 bands across 433 -1010 nm, down to < 100 m/pixel) [e.g., Blewett et al, 2011Blewett et al, , 2013Vilas et al, 2016] and at high spectral but low spatial resolution from the Visible and Infrared Spectrograph (VIRS) component of the Mercury Atmospheric and Surface Composition Spectrometer (MASCS) (5-nm resolution across 300 -1450 nm, footprint size ≥ 0.1 km cross-track and 3 km along-track) [Izenberg et al, 2015]. However, the relatively featureless character of Mercury's surface spectra presents an obstacle to direct determination of composition: absorption bands used to determine mineralogy on other planetary surfaces and in terrestrial laboratory experiments are weakly developed even in fresh material due to a low abundance of ferrous iron [Hapke et al, 1975;Vilas, 1985;Warell, 2003;Izenberg et al, 2014], and are further weakened by rapid optical maturation in the high-energy space environment at Mercury [Lucey and Riner, 2011;Riner and Lucey, 2012].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High sulfur concentrations in Mercurian lavas may result either from high sulfur solubility in magmas (Zolotov et al, 2013) and/or from transport of sulfide droplets from the mantle source regions to the surface of the planet (Malavergne et al, 2014). The first hypothesis is consistent with the absence of spectral evidence for sulfide minerals in surface rocks (McClintock et al, 2008;Izenberg et al, 2014) while the second could explain the correlations between S and Ca-Mg observed in Mercurian lavas . Understanding the origin of high sulfur concentrations at the surface of Mercury is important to better constrain the structure of the planet and the distribution of sulfur amongst the different reservoirs (mantle, core and crust), the mechanisms of explosive volcanism (Kerber et al, 2009;Thomas et al, 2014a;Weider et al, 2016), and the formation of the hollows (sub-kilometer scale shallow depressions surrounded by bright deposits) which may have formed during sublimation of volatiles (Blewett et al, 2013;Thomas et al, 2014b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This implies that their high sulfur content is related to high sulfur solubility in the mafic magma, which probably explains the absence of spectral evidence for a sulfide phase at the Mercurian surface (McClintock et al, 2008;Izenberg et al, 2014).…”
Section: Transport Of Sulfur From the Mantle To The Mercurian Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%