12th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (27th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference) 2006
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-2622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Low-Noise Potential of Distributed Propulsion on a Catamaran Aircraft

Abstract: The noise shielding potential of an inboard-wing catamaran aircraft when coupled with distributed propulsion is examined. Here, only low-frequency jet noise from mid-wing-mounted engines is considered. Because low frequencies are the most difficult to shield, these calculations put a lower bound on the potential shielding benefit. In this proof-of-concept study, simple physical models are used to describe the 3-D scattering of jet noise by conceptualized catamaran aircraft. The Fast Scattering Code is used to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These complexities must be embedded within the liner's acoustic impedance Z and create a large possible parametric dependence to capture these effects, as discussed in the survey by Motsinger & Kraft (1995), creating a complex modelling challenge. Proposed future applications of acoustic liners to aircraft exteriors will further increase the parametric range required of impedance models (Posey, Tinetti & Dunn 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These complexities must be embedded within the liner's acoustic impedance Z and create a large possible parametric dependence to capture these effects, as discussed in the survey by Motsinger & Kraft (1995), creating a complex modelling challenge. Proposed future applications of acoustic liners to aircraft exteriors will further increase the parametric range required of impedance models (Posey, Tinetti & Dunn 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flexibility offered by DEP systems permits placing the propulsors over the airframe in such a way to enhance noise shielding effects. Posey et al [94] achieved low-frequency noise reductions of the order of 20 dB across a significant community area. For turbo-electric distributed propulsion systems-i.e., when the electric power is provided by a common turbine-an effective by-pass ratio can be defined as the ratio of mass flow rate of all combined airflows to the one that enters the turbine.…”
Section: Noise Mitigation For Dep Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional advantage of retaining flexibility in the placement of propulsors is the ability to leverage noise shielding of wing-body surfaces or noise-reducing effects of boundary-layer ingestion [6,69]. For example, Posey et al [70] leveraged a DP system on a twin-fuselage platform and projected a low-frequency (f ≤ 320 Hz) reduction in noise of 20 dB across large community areas. A similar noise shielding approach was utilized in the development of the Quiet Short-Haul Research Aircraft vehicle developed by NASA [71][72][73][74][75].…”
Section: Distributed Electric Propulsion Enabled Noise Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%