1979
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(79)90014-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The low-stress creep of fine-grain uranium dioxide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is quite original, since it is generally assumed that creep deformation of UO 2 in conditions close to those chosen in this study does not lead to a change in form of the grains [6] [19]. It is consistent with creep processes considered in different ceramics [23] and indicates that plastic deformation and sliding processes, within the grains, are also involved in the creep process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is quite original, since it is generally assumed that creep deformation of UO 2 in conditions close to those chosen in this study does not lead to a change in form of the grains [6] [19]. It is consistent with creep processes considered in different ceramics [23] and indicates that plastic deformation and sliding processes, within the grains, are also involved in the creep process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It is generally assumed in the literature that creep deformation of UO 2 pellets during compression tests does not induce a significant change in the grain shape, which remains equiax (at least in testing conditions and deformation levels close to those considered in this work) [19,6]. This characteristic is generally interpreted as a consequence of a grain boundary sliding (GBS) mechanism without grain deformation.…”
Section: Grain Shape and Orientation Changesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…22 These observations indicate that grain-boundary sliding is the primary deformation mechanism, the strain rate being controlled by the diffusion necessary to accommodate the motion of the grains. Such a mechanism, described by the Ashby-Verrall model, 33 makes it possible to explain successfully the microstructural and mechanical behavior observed in other ceramic materials with similar grain sizes, where a stress exponent close to unity was systematically reported: UO 2 , n ϭ 1.5, d ϭ 2-10 m; 34 NiO, n ϭ 1.4, d ϭ 9 m; 35 Y 2 O 3 -stabilized cubic ZrO 2 , n ϭ 1.3, d ϭ 2-6 m; 36 and YBa 2 Cu 3 O x , n ϭ 1.0, d ϭ 10 m. 37 The Ashby-Verrall model for grain-boundary sliding accommodated by diffusion leads to 33…”
Section: (2) Deformation Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The ability of ceramics to undergo superplastic deformation was, initially, recognized in 1979 and 1980 for uranium oxide and magnesium oxide, respectively 1, 2. In 1986, Wakai et al 3 reported experiments showing an elongation of 120% for a fine‐grained (<300 nm) 3 mol%‐Y 2 O 3 stabilized tetragonal zirconia (3Y‐TZP) at 1723 K. Afterward, a large number of investigations 4–12 have been carried out to identify the underlying mechanism for such a deformation in a wide range of temperatures and applied stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%