The Low-Temperature Three-Dimensional Structures of the Second-Stage Caesium Graphitide

Abstract

The three‐dimensional (3D) structure of the second‐stage CSC24 graphitide was investigated by recording hk.l monochromatic rotating‐crystal diffractograms. At low temperature, the two‐dimensional (2D) structure is formed of an incommensurate (2.53 x 2.53 R 14.5°) and a commensurate (2 x 2 R 0°) lattice. Below 140 K, whereas the Cs incommensurate layers become 3D ordered, the 2 x 2 R 0° commensurate layers are randomly distributed in the structure. The commensurate structure, with composition CsC16 (stage two), probably equilibrates the lack of Cs induced by the incommensurate structure (composition CSC26), in order to reach the global composition CSC24 of the compound. Depending on the temperature, two kinds of stackings appear. Below 140 K, the incommensurate Cs layers are arranged in a 2D‐modulated initial stacking, transformed at a lower temperature into a rhombohedral stacking in which Cs atoms are modulated along the c axis. Simulation of the selection rules allowed the determination of models of the incommensurate layers stacking along the c axis, with translations from one Cs layer to another layer commensurate with the graphite lattice. The initial stacking is described by a pseudo‐two‐layer model with successive random translations and a short‐range order. The structure appearing at a lower temperature is described by a pseudorhombohedral stacking with definite translations. The transition from the initial stacking with a first‐neighbour interaction to the pseudorhombohedral stacking with a second‐neighbour interaction could be a result of the change in interactions between the Cs atoms and the graphitic host, due to the dominating influence of the graphite periodic potential at low temperature.

Low temperature structures of the second stage cesium graphitide and effect of trace impurities

“…We will show that the low-temperature transition previously described 6 is due to a weak pollution by impurities in the graphite-cesium compounds. From x-ray diffraction on the two types of compounds, we will discuss the differences in the structural evolution with temperature.…”

“…A small step was observed in the thermal evolution curve (identity period versus temperature) at 140 K, with the change in I c period from 9.33Å to 9.32Å (Fig. 6 The single phase stage 2 existing at room temperature was changed into two stage 2 structures below 150 K as shown, for example, in from the relative intensities of the lines. 14 In a previous paper, a reversible first order transition was already pointed out in the 00l diffraction pattern of CsC 24 (I).…”