2004
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2004.838822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The lower bounds on Q for lossy electric and magnetic dipole antennas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In reality, eddy currents cause the current to bunch around the wire's surface, which increases the loss resistance of both multi-turn and single-turn loops [26]. This makes it difficult to accurately estimate the radiation efficiency of wire antennas using conventional methods [11][12][13].…”
Section: A Capacitively Loaded Te10 Antenna (Magnetic Dipole)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In reality, eddy currents cause the current to bunch around the wire's surface, which increases the loss resistance of both multi-turn and single-turn loops [26]. This makes it difficult to accurately estimate the radiation efficiency of wire antennas using conventional methods [11][12][13].…”
Section: A Capacitively Loaded Te10 Antenna (Magnetic Dipole)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the most common method of analytically estimating tradeoffs between radiation efficiency and size is to consider common antenna types (e.g. capacitively loaded loop, inductively loaded dipole), and then approximate the current distribution to calculate the radiated and dissipated power [11][12][13]. However, this approach is not general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] The reasons for the decreased efficiency of the antenna fabricated using direct transfer patterning is the additional substrate loss, and the lower skin depth due to the higher frequency of operation. [22] Although manual fabrication offers improved performance, manually bending wires is a time consuming and potentially expensive process. Silver ink printing achieves comparable Q 's, but significantly lower efficiency than direct transfer patterned devices since the conductivity of the ink is only 30% that of copper.…”
Section: Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for implantable applications, the closer the antenna is to the skin, the less the signal attenuates within the tissue. Therefore, higher frequencies can be used to avoid the limitations on the radiation efficiency η for electrically small antennas (ESA; if the antenna electrical size ka < 0.5, it can be considered electrically small [13]). The most efficient bands would be the ISM 2.45 GHz for a few cm deep implants and 5.8 GHz for the subcutaneous [11].…”
Section: A Operating Frequency Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, to compensate for the antenna detuning, an extended bandwidth BW is preferred. However, it undermines the radiation efficiency, as BW ∝ ka/η [13].…”
Section: B Improving Efficiency Of In-body Antennasmentioning
confidence: 99%