2019
DOI: 10.1111/jvp.12778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The lower limit of quantification in pharmacokinetic analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The signal-to-noise ratio at 0.0156 ng/ml was >10, therefore, the limit of detection was deemed to be below this level. A lower limit of quantification is not reported, as recently recommended (32).…”
Section: Lcms Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signal-to-noise ratio at 0.0156 ng/ml was >10, therefore, the limit of detection was deemed to be below this level. A lower limit of quantification is not reported, as recently recommended (32).…”
Section: Lcms Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For data below the analytical limit of quantification (BLQ; Woodward and Whittem, 2019a), the data points were defined as left-censored at the limit of quantification, 0.03 mg/L. All BLQ points were replaced in the data set with 0.03 mg/L and flagged as censored.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the cephapirin data set, the residual milk concentrations were treated as measures of alveolar concentration in the model, but the foremilk data from this study were not modelled (Stockler et al, ). For each data set, data points below the analytical method limit of quantification were excluded from the analysis (Woodward & Whittem, ) as censored regression methods were considered outside the scope of this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%