Tectonic Evolution, Collision, and Seismicity of Southwest Asia<subtitle>In Honor of Manuel Berberian’s Forty-Five Years
DOI: 10.1130/2016.2525(10)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The lower–middle Cambrian transition and the Sauk I-II unconformable boundary in Iran, a record of late early Cambrian global Hawke Bay regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…from a distal compared to proximal source within the Arabian shield) cannot readily account for the up‐section increase in rounding of zircon, rutile, and tourmaline (Figure 10). Considering that the quartz‐rich unit was deposited in a high‐energy shallow marine setting (Geyer et al, 2014; Lasemi & Amin‐Rasouli, 2016), it is plausible that the increase in roundness of detrital zircon, rutile, and tourmaline grains in this unit relative to underlying strata reflects protracted reworking in a higher energy depositional environment. However, the predominance of angular apatite grains–the most mechanically labile mineral analysed in this study–within the quartz‐rich unit is inconsistent with this scenario.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…from a distal compared to proximal source within the Arabian shield) cannot readily account for the up‐section increase in rounding of zircon, rutile, and tourmaline (Figure 10). Considering that the quartz‐rich unit was deposited in a high‐energy shallow marine setting (Geyer et al, 2014; Lasemi & Amin‐Rasouli, 2016), it is plausible that the increase in roundness of detrital zircon, rutile, and tourmaline grains in this unit relative to underlying strata reflects protracted reworking in a higher energy depositional environment. However, the predominance of angular apatite grains–the most mechanically labile mineral analysed in this study–within the quartz‐rich unit is inconsistent with this scenario.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sedimentary structures, bedform geometry, and trace fossils have been interpreted to indicate a fluvial to the shallow marine depositional environment for the Lalun Formation (Geyer et al, 2014; Lasemi & Amin‐Rasouli, 2016). The arkose unit is interpreted to have been deposited in fluvial and estuarine environments, followed by marine transgression during the deposition of the shale unit, and subsequent regression and deposition of the quartz‐rich unit in a shoreface environment (Bayet‐Goll & Daraei, 2020; Bayet‐Goll et al, 2018; Geyer et al, 2014; Lasemi & Amin‐Rasouli, 2016). The increase in grain size toward the Zagros zone, and W–SW to E–NE directed paleocurrents (Bayet‐Goll et al, 2018; Poursoltani, 2020) indicates sediment transport from the Gondwanan hinterland (Arabian Plate) toward Iran.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the Ediacaran–Cambrian transition, the Iranian blocks were originally part of a series of peri‐Gondwanan terranes that bordered the north‐western margin of Gondwana (the so‐called Proto‐Palaeotethyan margin sensu Lasemi 2001 and Proto‐Tethyan margin sensu Stampfli & Borel 2002). This part of the peri‐Gondwanan margin is interpreted either as a thermally subsiding passive margin of the Afro‐Arabian platform that was formed after the late Proterozoic rifting of the north‐western Gondwana supercontinent (Stöcklin, 1968; Berberian & King 1981; Husseini 1989; Talbot & Alavi 1996; Lasemi 2001, 2007, 2017) or alternatively as an active continental margin with Cadomian arc plutonism and volcanism resulting from the southwards subduction of the Proto‐Tethys ocean along the northern margin of Gondwana (Ramezani & Tucker 2003; Hassanzadeh et al . 2008; Horton et al .…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During Ediacaran and Cambrian, Iran was part of a thermally subsiding passive margin that was formed through late Proterozoic rifting of northwestern Gondwana (Berberian and King 1981;Lasemi 2001;Lasemi and Amin-Rasouli 2016). Shallow-marine (mostly carbonates) and fluviodeltaic sediments were deposited over a vast area, from northern Arabia in the southeast to the Alborz region in northern Iran, forming the northern passive paleocontinental margin of Gondwana (Berberian and King 1981;Lasemi 2001;Berberian 2014, Lasemi andAmin-Rasouli 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shallow-marine (mostly carbonates) and fluviodeltaic sediments were deposited over a vast area, from northern Arabia in the southeast to the Alborz region in northern Iran, forming the northern passive paleocontinental margin of Gondwana (Berberian and King 1981;Lasemi 2001;Berberian 2014, Lasemi andAmin-Rasouli 2016). Facies and sequence stratigraphic studies of the upper Neoproterozoic through Paleozoic successions in the region (Lasemi 2001) suggest that Iran and northern Arabia were connected until their breakup in the early Permian (Lasemi and Amin-Rasouli 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%