2016
DOI: 10.4102/ve.v37i1.1587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The <i>Book of Ruth</i> in the time of the Judges and Ruth, the Moabitess

Abstract: This article addresses two issues in the Book of Ruth that have not yet received much scholarly attention: why is the narrative plotted in the time of the judges, whilst the time of narration dates to the postexilic period, and why is one of the protagonists Ruth, the Moabitess, whilst the law in Deuteronomy 23:3�4 (HB 4�5) clearly forbids the presence of Moabitess and Ammonites in the community of YHWH? A suggestion is made that a possible explanation to both these questions may be found in tensions regarding… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Middlemas (2011:119) says that it is paramount to take note of the religious observance in inclusive texts: she calls it the 'behavioural component '. De Villiers and Le Roux (2016) note the precondition of being 'Israel' is to be a community that worships YHWH.…”
Section: Israelite Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Middlemas (2011:119) says that it is paramount to take note of the religious observance in inclusive texts: she calls it the 'behavioural component '. De Villiers and Le Roux (2016) note the precondition of being 'Israel' is to be a community that worships YHWH.…”
Section: Israelite Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this subject of inclusivity in the Old Testament is relevant. Roux (2016:3) argue a very interesting point where the author of Ruth chose a specific historical time 'the time of the judges', which strategically sidesteps the jargon of the exclusivist circles of the priestly terminology used in the postexilic Second Temple period. This argument will be discussed later in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%