2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The luminosity evolution of nova shells

Abstract: Over the last decade, nova shells have been discovered around a small number of cataclysmic variables that had not been known to be post-novae, while other searches around much larger samples have been mostly unsuccessful. This raises the question about how long such shells are detectable after the eruption and whether this time limit depends on the characteristics of the nova. So far, there has been only one comprehensive study of the luminosity evolution of nova shells, undertaken almost two decades ago. Her… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are prominent OIII and Hα emission structures associated with this bow-shock nebula (or the nova shells; Bond & Miszalski 2018). Tappert et al (2020) found an Hα luminosity of 5.1 × 10 30 erg s −1 and OIII luminosity of 9.1 × 10 30 erg s −1 where these luminosities overlap within errors. Such a bow-shock like nebula exists around the black hole binary Cyg X-1 (at relatively larger size, but concentric ring-like emission regions trailing the shock region (as in BZ Cam) are not detected).…”
Section: Iron Emission and Absorption Linesmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are prominent OIII and Hα emission structures associated with this bow-shock nebula (or the nova shells; Bond & Miszalski 2018). Tappert et al (2020) found an Hα luminosity of 5.1 × 10 30 erg s −1 and OIII luminosity of 9.1 × 10 30 erg s −1 where these luminosities overlap within errors. Such a bow-shock like nebula exists around the black hole binary Cyg X-1 (at relatively larger size, but concentric ring-like emission regions trailing the shock region (as in BZ Cam) are not detected).…”
Section: Iron Emission and Absorption Linesmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…It has a bow-shock nebula (Krautter et al 1987;Griffith et al 1995;Greiner et al 2001), which is not consistent with a planetary nebula origin. New findings indicate that it may be associated with recurrent nova explosions of BZ Cam in timescales of millennia (Hoffmann & Vogt 2020;Tappert et al 2020). Winds from BZ Cam are detected in the FUV resonance lines (as P Cygni profiles) along with the Balmer and He I lines.…”
Section: Bz Cam and V592 Casmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…If we assume the Hα+[N II] luminosities as a function of time from maximum brightness presented in Figure 3 of Tappert et al (2020), then ∼ 1, 000 and ∼ 10, 000 'He/N' novae are needed to explain an L [FeX] ≈ 10 36 erg s −1 , which corresponds to the minimum [Fe X] luminosity in our sample. Even if we adopt the Milky Way nova rate of ∼ 25 yr −1 , which is much larger than that seen in dwarf galaxies (e.g., Shafter et al 2014) and assume that the 'He/N' nova are 50% of the total nova population, we would only expect ∼ 13 'He/N' novae within 1 year.…”
Section: Novaementioning
confidence: 97%
“…A more recent investigation of the long-term evolution of the H𝛼 and [O ] luminosities of nova shells in comparison with their light curve and nova speed class was presented by Tappert et al (2020).…”
Section: Time Evolution Of the H𝛼 Luminositymentioning
confidence: 99%