2017
DOI: 10.1353/ajm.2017.0026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mach stem equation and amplification in strongly nonlinear geometric optics

Abstract: We study highly oscillating solutions to a class of weakly well-posed hyperbolic initial boundary value problems. Weak well-posedness is associated with an amplification phenomenon of oscillating waves on the boundary. In the previous works [CGW14, CW14], we have rigorously justified a weakly nonlinear regime for semilinear problems. In that case, the forcing term on the boundary has amplitude O(ε 2 ) and oscillates at a frequency O(1/ε). The corresponding exact solution, which has been shown to exist on a tim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The question is to know whether or not the boundary condition (5.11c) determines on its own the trace U osc |x d =0,ψ d =0 . As already explained in [CGW11] and [CW17], the answer depends on the existence of a resonance between two incoming frequencies that generates an outgoing frequency. Such a resonance pattern is excluded by Assumption 7.…”
Section: Ansatz and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The question is to know whether or not the boundary condition (5.11c) determines on its own the trace U osc |x d =0,ψ d =0 . As already explained in [CGW11] and [CW17], the answer depends on the existence of a resonance between two incoming frequencies that generates an outgoing frequency. Such a resonance pattern is excluded by Assumption 7.…”
Section: Ansatz and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We do not see how to prove an analogue of Theorem 2.12 in this case, since the application of Proposition 4.6 requires that all D(ǫ, k, k − r) be "small". Another reason for our focus on the D( φ in ǫ ) case is its greater relevance to the Mach stem problem; this is explained in [CW17].…”
Section: Assumptions and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such constructions of geometric optics expansions in this context have a long story starting (in the author's knowledge) by the formal constructions given by [AM87] and [MR83] (see also [Maj88]) to explain the appearance of singularities in (non linear) fluid dynamics such as Mach stems formation. We also refer to [CW17] (and the many references therein) for the construction of such rigorous geometric optics expansions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%