2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The macroeconomic sources of systemic risk in the banking sectors of five new EU member states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
70
2
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
12
70
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Their key findings were that banking sector development ultimately leads towards the income inequality. Similar findings have been explained by [8].…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Their key findings were that banking sector development ultimately leads towards the income inequality. Similar findings have been explained by [8].…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Since macroeconomic conditions may have a strong impact on within as well as cross-country variation in bank risk-taking (Ali and Daly 2010;Bouvatier et al 2014;Castro 2013;Chaibi and Ftiti 2015;Festić et al 2011), we use three variables, GDP Per Capita (log), GDP Growth, and Inflation, to control for variation in macroeconomic conditions. GDP Per Capita (log) is measured as the natural logarithm of the annual gross domestic product per capita, measured in current US dollars.…”
Section: Methodology and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extant literature has focused on the structure of the banking industry (Boyd and Nicolo 2005;Martinez-Miera and Repullo 2010), banking regulations Haq et al 2014;Haq and RichardHeaney 2012;Rahman et al 2015), macroeconomic indicators such as GDP per capita, GDP growth, and inflation (Ali and Daly 2010;Bouvatier et al 2014;Castro 2013;Chaibi and Ftiti 2015;Festić et al 2011), the level of financial development (Vithessonthi 2014), legal institutions (Cole and Turk 2013;Houston et al 2010), financial openness (Bourgain et al 2012;Cubillas and González 2014), national culture , and political institutions ) as significant determinants of cross-country variation in bank risk-taking. We analyze the impact of trade openness on bank risk-taking behavior and add to this literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first relationship has been widely corroborated, Festic et al (2011). As noted by Truck and Rachev (2005), a change in the portfolio's default risk is given by either a change in its exposure profile (e.g., debtors moving from high-quality ratings to low-quality ones) or a change in the probability of default (PD) of a given type of debtor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%