2018
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1182-17.2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Magnitude, But Not the Sign, of MT Single-Trial Spike-Time Correlations Predicts Motion Detection Performance

Abstract: Spike-time correlations capture the short timescale covariance between the activity of neurons on a single trial. These correlations can significantly vary in magnitude and sign from trial to trial, and have been proposed to contribute to information encoding in visual cortex. While monkeys performed a motion-pulse detection task, we examined the behavioral impact of both the magnitude and sign of single-trial spike-time correlations between two nonoverlapping pools of middle temporal (MT) neurons. We applied … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We next measured how the neural activity encodes whether or not the animal turned the wheel correctly and referred to this measurement as 'Detect probability' (Hashemi, Golzar, Smith, & Cook, 2018). We similarly divided the trials into 12 groups according to the different combinations of right and left stimulus contrast levels (0, 25, 50, 100), ignoring equal contrast pairs.…”
Section: Detect Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We next measured how the neural activity encodes whether or not the animal turned the wheel correctly and referred to this measurement as 'Detect probability' (Hashemi, Golzar, Smith, & Cook, 2018). We similarly divided the trials into 12 groups according to the different combinations of right and left stimulus contrast levels (0, 25, 50, 100), ignoring equal contrast pairs.…”
Section: Detect Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the stimulus decoding, we measured the differences between the spike count distribution of trials with contralateral stimulus higher than zero and trials with zero contra stimulus contrast level for all 12 conditions. Similarly, decision decoding was evaluated by measuring the differences between Hit and Missed trials within 12 conditions referred to as 'Detect Probability' (DP) (Hashemi et al, 2018). Our results showed that the stimulus-selective neurons detected by dPCA, indeed encoded the stimulus more strongly than the decision.…”
Section: Distributed Evidence Accumulation Across the Mice's Brainmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Similarly, decision decoding was evaluated by measuring the differences between Hit and Missed trials within 12 conditions referred to as “detect probability” (DP; Hashemi et al, 2018 ). Our results showed that the stimulus-selective neurons detected by dPCA, indeed encoded the stimulus more strongly than the decision.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also measured how well the neural activity encodes whether or not the animal turned the wheel correctly and referred to this measurement as “detect probability” ( Hashemi et al, 2018 ). Accordingly, the trials were divided into 12 groups based on the different combinations of the right and left stimulus contrast levels, excluding the conditions with equal contrast levels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%