2017
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Magnitude of Viscous Dissipation in Strongly Stratified Two-dimensional Convection

Abstract: Convection in astrophysical systems must be maintained against dissipation. Although the effects of dissipation are often assumed to be negligible, theory suggests that in strongly stratified convecting fluids, the dissipative heating rate can exceed the luminosity carried by convection. Here, we explore this possibility using a series of numerical simulations. We consider two-dimensional numerical models of hydrodynamic convection in a Cartesian layer under the anelastic approximation and demonstrate that the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Different results were obtained in Currie & Browning (2017), where a larger dissipation than our limit (7.25) is obtained. There are actually several differences in the configuration they have studied: (i) they use an EoS of an ideal gas, (ii) they model conduction using the gradient of entropy, (iii) they use a boundary condition of a fixed flux (bottom), (iv) they consider inertia (Pr = 1 or 10), (v) they have a square domain and (vi) they have non-penetrative conditions on lateral walls.…”
Section: Effect Of Confinement and Inertiacontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different results were obtained in Currie & Browning (2017), where a larger dissipation than our limit (7.25) is obtained. There are actually several differences in the configuration they have studied: (i) they use an EoS of an ideal gas, (ii) they model conduction using the gradient of entropy, (iii) they use a boundary condition of a fixed flux (bottom), (iv) they consider inertia (Pr = 1 or 10), (v) they have a square domain and (vi) they have non-penetrative conditions on lateral walls.…”
Section: Effect Of Confinement and Inertiacontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…In our work, this state is obtained in the limit of large superadiabatic Rayleigh numbers, although that limit might be difficult to reach for small dissipation numbers. A second state, observed by Currie & Browning (2017), can be seen when inertia is introduced and when vertical walls are present. Convection is large-scale, descending plumes are stuck to a wall (the left wall in the particular snapshot in figure 17) and viscous dissipation is enhanced compared to the first state.…”
Section: Effect Of Confinement and Inertiamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…By adopting the Boussinesq approximation, we have neglected the effects of compressibility and imposed a symmetry between upflows and downflows that does not exist in the full system, which may well have implications for the stratification that is established (e.g., Korre et al 2017;Käpylä et al 2017a). Moreover, in strongly stratified systems, dissipative heating can be large resulting in convective fluxes that greatly exceed the luminosity (see e.g., Currie & Browning 2017). Furthermore, when stratification is present, the convective velocities will also generally vary with depth, so the influence of rotation on the dynamics may be depth-dependent as well (see, e.g., discussions in Ireland & Browning 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, we anticipate from the results of e.g., Currie & Browning (2017) that f is closer to 1 than 0, but its precise value must be measured from simulations. Indeed, we find that f 0 but f < 1 in our simulations (see e.g., Fig.…”
Section: Kinetic Energy and The Dissipation-flux Linkmentioning
confidence: 99%