2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-021-10070-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mainstream and extension of contemporary virtual reality education research: Insights from a co-citation network analysis (2015–2020)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen, Zou et al, 2021). Moreover, some have adopted co-citation analysis, which was first proposed by Price (1965) and Small (1973), to measure the relationships among cited and citing articles in various fields, including educational leadership and administration (Hallinger & Kovacevic, 2019, 2021), e-book learning (Tang, 2021), nursing education (Chang et al, 2021) and virtual reality-supported education (Cheng et al, 2022). Recently, scholars have emphasised the value of analysing frequently cited publications in identifying research trends (Antonakis et al, 2014;Buta et al, 2016;Chang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chen, Zou et al, 2021). Moreover, some have adopted co-citation analysis, which was first proposed by Price (1965) and Small (1973), to measure the relationships among cited and citing articles in various fields, including educational leadership and administration (Hallinger & Kovacevic, 2019, 2021), e-book learning (Tang, 2021), nursing education (Chang et al, 2021) and virtual reality-supported education (Cheng et al, 2022). Recently, scholars have emphasised the value of analysing frequently cited publications in identifying research trends (Antonakis et al, 2014;Buta et al, 2016;Chang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few studies have visualised and examined studies on information literacy in higher education as related to specific settings or education levels (e.g., Pinto, 2015;, especially by using co-citation analysis. Some researchers have also pointed out that two frequently cited articles are not always necessarily frequently co-cited articles because the researchers conducting the studies described in the citing articles may not have similar research interests (Chang et al, 2021;Cheng et al, 2022;R. A. Smith, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous review papers in virtual reality-based education mostly used systematic literature review [58][59][60], co-citation network analysis [61], meta-analysis [62], and knowledge mapping analysis [63] as an analytical method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kurniawan et al also conducted a systematic literature review on 32 virtual realities for learning and found four purposes of applying virtual reality for learning including engagement, motivation, learning experience, and achievement [58]. Cheng reality education articles and found the main stream as the interaction between learners' cognition and affection in virtual reality-based learning [61]. A recent study conducted a systematic review on 139 virtual realities in K-12 and higher education articles published between 2000 and 2019 and found that virtual reality was used more in higher education than K-12 and science, social science, health, and medicine were the most popular fields using virtual reality [62].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-citation network analysis is regarded as a well-established analytic method for exploring the cited-and-citing relationships between two focal articles [14]. Researchers have adopted the method to analyze the intellectual structure of various themes, including e-book-supported learning [15] and virtual reality for education [16]. Garfield [17] suggested that citations can contract numbers MOST 110-2511-H-130-001 (Kai-Yu Tang), MOST 109-2410-H-424-003 (Chun-Hua Hsiao), and MOST 109-2511-H-011-002-MY3 (Gwo-Jen Hwang).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%