1963
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1963.tb13659.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Maintenance Requirement of Escherichia Coli

Abstract: Not all of the reactions that consume the carbon and energy source are directly coupled with growth. Motility requires an expenditure of adenosine triphosphate ( ATP) ( Sherris et nl., 1957). The accumulation of solutes to a higher concentration in the cell than in the medium requires an initial expenditure of energy (Kepes, 1960; Patlak, 1961 ). If the cell is permeable to the solute, the cell must expend metabolic energy continuously to maintain a higher intracellular than extracellular concentration. Finall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, a variety of ''bottom-up'' controls influence biosynthesis rates, and indirectly CUE, by affecting demand for PreC downstream of central metabolism (e.g., in organelles or cellular space where assembly of macromolecules occurs). For example, increasing temperature may increase efficiency by inducing assimilatory demand to sustain higher rates of biosynthesis (Pirt 1965;Linton and Stephenson 1978;Gommers et al 1988) or, alternatively, decrease CUE if dissimilatory demands increase (Rivkin and Legendre 2001) because of higher rates of R M (Marr et al 1963). Maximum CUE should be achieved when both top-down and bottomup forces work in concert, such as conditions where abundant, high quality resources are available and environmental cues (e.g., temperature, pH, community dynamics) are most conducive to biosynthesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, a variety of ''bottom-up'' controls influence biosynthesis rates, and indirectly CUE, by affecting demand for PreC downstream of central metabolism (e.g., in organelles or cellular space where assembly of macromolecules occurs). For example, increasing temperature may increase efficiency by inducing assimilatory demand to sustain higher rates of biosynthesis (Pirt 1965;Linton and Stephenson 1978;Gommers et al 1988) or, alternatively, decrease CUE if dissimilatory demands increase (Rivkin and Legendre 2001) because of higher rates of R M (Marr et al 1963). Maximum CUE should be achieved when both top-down and bottomup forces work in concert, such as conditions where abundant, high quality resources are available and environmental cues (e.g., temperature, pH, community dynamics) are most conducive to biosynthesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical models that turn out to be special cases of DEB models, or very good numerical approximations to them. (Marr et al 1963) and (Pirt 1965) Droop 1973 reserve (cell quota) dynamics (Droop 1973(Droop , 1974(Droop , 1983 (Beer & Anderson 1997) flexibility, e.g. bacteria and phototrophs such as microalgae) and several structures (such as roots and shoots of plants, or body parts (organs)), see Kooijman (2010).…”
Section: Metabolic Organization In the Standard Dynamic Energy Budgetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this model: BGE=− d dL (E/eff EV +V ). Contrary to the DEB model, the Marr-Pirt model (Marr et al, 1963;Pirt, 1965) assumes a direct transfer from assimilation to growth and includes one maintenance term only. As this model does not comprise any reserve compartment, maintenance is directly realised from biomass (Eq.…”
Section: Bge Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%