An open-ended questionnaire was sent to all American Psychological Association-approved internship programs requesting information on training experiences in their programs that expose the intern to the interface between psychology and law. A listing of the various types of legal/forensic experiences available from specific sites is presented. The scope of these experiences and the need for qualitative assessment of them is discussed.In recent years, an increasing number of articles have appeared discussing the positive role psychologists can play in various parts of the legal system. For example, burdened with few mental health professionals (Fenster, Litwack, & Symonds, 1975), increasing offender populations (Nietzel & Moss, 1972), little knowledge of research/evaluation techniques (Twain, McGee, & Bennett, 1973;Waldo, 1971), and an isolation from academic institutions and/or professional groups possessing pertinent knowledge and capacity (Andrews & Gendreau, 1976), the correctional system has acknowledged a strong need for an increased involvement of psychologists.The criminal justice system has shown a similar need. For example, professionals see the need for psychologists to be involved in pretrial, presentence, and prerelease assessments (Twain et al., 1973), crisis intervention with victims and families of offenders, counseling of police officers, participation in police recruitment procedures, and training of law enforcement personnel in cultural/racial tension reduction and riot prevention (Brodsky, 1973).The need for psychologists to be involved in civil legal areas, although less widely discussed, is no less important. For example, psychologists are involved in helping solve family problems arising out of impending legal separations and divorces, providing consultation services to state service agencies (e.g., Department of Welfare), and providing expert testimony before courts, administrative tribunals, and legislatures relating to numerous civil (and criminal) matters (e.g., the impact of mental distress coverage in workmen's compensation laws).From this brief discussion, it is clear that psychologists are needed to perform a wide variety of services that are directly related to the law, legal system, and legal process (Sales & Elwork, in press). Yet, traditionally when psychology "touched" the law, it was referred to as forensic psychology. That is a misnomer, however, since the term forensic applies only to matters belonging to or connected with a court (Black, 1968). Therefore, the phrase legal/forensic has been chosen for this article, since it is meant to encompass all areas in which an interface between psychology and the law may occur. As such, the term is broad in scope and applies to the involvement or potential involvement of psychology in all legal matters (e.g., evaluation of insanity, incompetency) and all legal agencies (e.g., law enforcement, courts, and correctional agencies).With this broad involvement, it is no wonder that practicing clinicians rate legal/ forensic training as a hig...