2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2433036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Making of Legal Elites and the IDIA of Justice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, neither is this to suggest that lawyers were advantaged because law schools were created with intention to create egalitarian workspaces. The new national law schools were hardly designed as feeder schools for law firms (Ballakrishnen forthcoming), and these schools remain gender imbalanced and unequal in other important ways (e.g., Ballakrishnen and Samuel forthcoming re: recruiting female faculty and creating feminist spaces; Basheer et al re: caste and class inequality). Instead, the gender equal entry into these schools—and subsequent reinforcement in these firms—was predicated on other factors like a high threshold for entry that attracted the most competitive students (regardless of gender), and new kinds of testing (which were not yet gender typed).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, neither is this to suggest that lawyers were advantaged because law schools were created with intention to create egalitarian workspaces. The new national law schools were hardly designed as feeder schools for law firms (Ballakrishnen forthcoming), and these schools remain gender imbalanced and unequal in other important ways (e.g., Ballakrishnen and Samuel forthcoming re: recruiting female faculty and creating feminist spaces; Basheer et al re: caste and class inequality). Instead, the gender equal entry into these schools—and subsequent reinforcement in these firms—was predicated on other factors like a high threshold for entry that attracted the most competitive students (regardless of gender), and new kinds of testing (which were not yet gender typed).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%