ABSTRACT:This essay aims to introduce readers to the social studies of accounting, attending in particular to the roles and relevance of Foucault's works for this field. We provide a brief overview of social studies of accounting, discuss recent developments in Foucault oriented accounting scholarship, and position the articles that appear in this special issue in the context of these developments. In the concluding section, we argue that accounting is an inherently territorializing activity. The calculative instruments of accountancy transform not only the possibilities for personhood, they also construct the physical and abstract calculable spaces that individuals inhabit. A focus on territorializing shifts attention to the links between calculating and governing.Keywords: Accounting, governmentality, calculative practices, power, territorialisation.Accounting practices have come to play a pivotal role in organizing contemporary economic and social life. Whether in the private or the public sector, activities are increasingly structured around calculations of costs and benefits, estimates of financial returns, assessments of performance and risk, and a plethora of other forms of numerical and financial representation. Yet, despite the influence of this vast yet still growing calculative infrastructure, relatively little attention has been given to the ways in which this economizing of the entire social field alters modalities of governing and forms of personhood and power.Weber, Sombart and Marx are typically identified as the founding fathers of economic sociology. 1 In different ways, they pointed out the pivotal role that double-entry bookkeeping and capital accounting played in the emergence of capitalist modes of production. Yet, the new economic sociology of recent decades has remained largely silent on this topic, albeit with some notable exceptions. 2 Somewhat ironically, the rediscovery of accounting as an object of
5critical and social scientific enquiry has occurred largely outside the disciplinary boundaries of sociology, and more particularly within the discipline of accounting itself. 3 Notwithstanding the attention of accounting researchers to such issues, it remains the case that relatively few studies have examined the intrinsic links between calculative infrastructures and modes of governing individuals and social relations. Equally, and despite the increasing number of studies examining the roles of calculative models in framing socio-technical interactions in the particular setting of financial markets, little attention has been paid in such studies to the ways in which these models alter or shape modalities of governing and forms of political power. 4 This is a pity, for a much wider phenomenon than financial markets and the models that animate and operationalize them is at issue here. Put differently, performativity can be an empty notion unless we pay attention to both the conditions and consequences of metrics and models. 5 With this special issue, we call for greater attention by...