1997
DOI: 10.2307/2580721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Making of Union Democracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, there are liberal pluralist approaches. These suggest that the extent of participatory democracy reflects whether or not a union has a democratic constitution (all COSATU unions have to, as a condition of affiliation), voting mechanisms (Stepan‐Norris 1997: 476–77), the degree of membership participation in elections (Morris and Fosh 2000: 96), and/or meetings in general (Seidman 1953: 222). Parks et al.…”
Section: Measuring Participatory Democracy In Unionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, there are liberal pluralist approaches. These suggest that the extent of participatory democracy reflects whether or not a union has a democratic constitution (all COSATU unions have to, as a condition of affiliation), voting mechanisms (Stepan‐Norris 1997: 476–77), the degree of membership participation in elections (Morris and Fosh 2000: 96), and/or meetings in general (Seidman 1953: 222). Parks et al.…”
Section: Measuring Participatory Democracy In Unionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: 61; a similar point is made by Taft 1944: 248). In turn, this may be reflected by whether, how often, and how closely elections are contested (Seidman 1953: 223; Stepan‐Norris 1997: 477–80).…”
Section: Measuring Participatory Democracy In Unionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Como pudimos ver en estos casos, la mayoría de los estudios llevados a cabo bajo esta perspectiva presenta una visión de la democracia sindical interna de tipo institucionalista (LINDBLOM, 1970;HEMINGWAY, 1978;EDELSTEIN & WARNER, 1979;LIPSET, TROW & COLEMAN, 1989;STEPAN-NORRIS, 1997;HECKSCHER, 2001). En este sentido, su preocupación tiene que ver principalmente con el tipo de sistema electoral, la posibilidad o no de inclusión de distintas listas en los comicios, la libre participación de los afiliados en la elección, y, sobre todo, la alternancia en el gobierno.…”
Section: Iii1 De La Democracia a La Políticaunclassified
“…The resource mobilization perspective addressed conservative transformation (largely in terms of the “shift to organizational maintenance”) as an important potential dynamic in movements, although not inevitable (Zald and Denton 1963; Zald and Ash 1966; Zald and Berger 1978). Accumulating research has specified a variety of conditions that work against conservatism such as the structure of political organization, commitments of leaders, political crises, and group identities (Lipset, Trow, and Coleman 1956; Jenkins 1977; Jenkins and Eckert 1986; Clemens 1993, 1997; Stepan‐Norris and Zeitlin 1995; Cress and Snow 1996; Stepan‐Norris 1997; Ganz 2000; Voss and Sherman 2000; Clemens and Minkoff 2004; Ganz et al. 2004).…”
Section: Political Incorporation Leadership and Strategic Choicementioning
confidence: 99%