1936
DOI: 10.2307/1005507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mammalian Fauna of the White River Oligocene: Part I. Insectivora and Carnivora

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
87
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The possible existence of sexual dimorphism in Hyaenodon species was suggested by Matthew (1901) and Scott and Jepsen (1936), who argued that H. horridus and H. cruentus are different sexes of the same species. Later, Mellett (1977) also concluded that the differences between these two species are a result of dimorphism based on the frequency distribution of tooth size; hence, he synonymized H. cruentus with H. horridus.…”
Section: B O D Y M a S S E S T I M A T E S F O R H Y A E N O D O N T mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The possible existence of sexual dimorphism in Hyaenodon species was suggested by Matthew (1901) and Scott and Jepsen (1936), who argued that H. horridus and H. cruentus are different sexes of the same species. Later, Mellett (1977) also concluded that the differences between these two species are a result of dimorphism based on the frequency distribution of tooth size; hence, he synonymized H. cruentus with H. horridus.…”
Section: B O D Y M a S S E S T I M A T E S F O R H Y A E N O D O N T mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Intraspeci®c dimorphism has been suggested for two species of North American hyaenodontids, Thinocyon velox (Matthew 1909) and Hyaenodon horridus (Matthew 1901;Scott and Jepsen 1936;Mellett 1977). It is dif®cult to compare the estimated body sizes for hyaenodontid fossils because the values¯uctuate a lot depending on which elements are available for body mass estimation of each hyaenodontid individual; however, the result in this study seems to support the suggestion.…”
Section: B O D Y M a S S E S T I M A T E S F O R H Y A E N O D O N T mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Order APATOTHERIA Scott and Jepsen, 1936 Family APATEMYIDAE Matthew, 1909 Genus APATEMYS Marsh, 1872b Apatemys bellulus Marsh, 1872b Figure 2.1-6, Table 1 Referred specimens. From UCM Locality 92189: RM1, UCM 70967; Lm1, UCM 95804; Lm2, UCM 68923; Rm3s, UCM 68424, 79676; Lm3, UCM 95807.…”
Section: Systematic Paleontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plesiomorphic amphicyonid postcranial morphology is represented by the Oligocene Daphoenus vetus Leidy (Hatcher, 1902b;Scott and Jepsen, 1936). The following comparisons of the smaller temnocyonine species are with D. vetus, while the large temnocyonines are compared with Daphoenodon superbus (Peterson, 1910), whose skeleton can be considered an essentially unmodified, scaled-up version of that of D. vetus.…”
Section: Cursorial Adaptations In the Limb Osteology Of Temnocyoninesmentioning
confidence: 99%